Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 20:33:52 +0200
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Matt Morehouse <mascasa@google.com>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] perf: Add support for SIGTRAP on perf events
Message-ID: <20210329183351.GD24849@redhat.com>
References: <20210324112503.623833-1-elver@google.com>
 <20210324112503.623833-7-elver@google.com>
 <YFxGb+QHEumZB6G8@elver.google.com>
 <YGHC7V3bbCxhRWTK@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20210329142705.GA24849@redhat.com>
 <CANpmjNN=dpMmanU1mzigUscZQ6_Bx6u4u5mS4Ukhy0PTiexgDA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNN=dpMmanU1mzigUscZQ6_Bx6u4u5mS4Ukhy0PTiexgDA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Precedence: bulk

On 03/29, Marco Elver wrote:
>
> So, per off-list discussion, it appears that I should ask to clarify:
> PF_EXISTING or PF_EXITING?

Aaaaaaah, sorry Marco.

PF_EXITING, of course.

Oleg.