Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] i2c: tegra: Improve handling of i2c_recover_bus()
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20210329190546.24869-1-digetx@gmail.com>
 <20210329191531.GA6654@kunai>
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7b5e8060-abee-a9e1-1c88-78f0a20e2e96@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Mar 2021 22:28:13 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210329191531.GA6654@kunai>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

29.03.2021 22:15, Wolfram Sang пишет:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:05:46PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> The i2c_recover_bus() returns -EOPNOTSUPP if bus recovery isn't wired up,
>> which the case for older Tegra SoCs at the moment. This error code is then
>> propagated to I2C client and might be confusing, thus return -EIO instead.
> 
> Hmm, makes sense. Maybe we should change it in the core? But with EBUSY
> instead?
> 

This also should be a good variant. I'll update the patch, thanks.