Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 04:04:27 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
       Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
       Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: faults and signals
Message-ID: <20061010020427.GA15822@wotan.suse.de>
References: <20061009140354.13840.71273.sendpatchset@linux.site> <20061009140447.13840.20975.sendpatchset@linux.site> <1160427785.7752.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <452AEC8B.2070008@yahoo.com.au> <1160442685.32237.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <452AF546.4000901@yahoo.com.au> <1160445510.32237.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1160445601.32237.53.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1160445601.32237.53.camel@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 792
Lines: 19

On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 12:00:01PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> > Yes. Tho it's also fairly easy to just add an argument to the wrapper
> > and fix all archs... but yeah, I will play around.
> 
> Actually, user_mode(ptregs) is standard, we could add a ptregs arg to
> the wrapper... or just get rid of it and fix archs, it's not like it was
> that hard. There aren't that many callers :)
> 
> Is there any reason why we actually need that wrapper ?

Not much reason. If you go through and fix up all callers then
that should be fine.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/