Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp4157369pxf; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:09:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXpLUHXDJxDXFx0LjkODtfvIFkYcjtzLZHRzKxCjbCNp7CiWY9mjhclQfTZFaikogjXCHp X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4241:: with SMTP id g1mr32653256edb.331.1617088197131; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:09:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617088197; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VM3SFRA1CndSPLuVD5tGSHl/sRjFvpux8OBANkQXI9LZr9kcZN+caSbt8ZPGWqDNIw ec+YLB8o+JfOyJomi3OWgPfks8XyybK8KryKDpxXmNTqv5WmM+ml2DLw+s0u6MB6d4/B rSRwUTYsyL57JcpPqCVmcJEHDxHfnAvuCjNgNbLiUn/x5BnAlObA9KdKFghT6uZSFYbN afDuXCyxkHg/447jp3P+sGCOWqToBuskrDBF+mfLw6zbR4YEw5L6omBaJGEpqexRx4ah 8v3gKDa9uR2ALtVLkUP0cb+VptI9VXF6CdPQ2IJfEHzdbZjDflusml7osomnJOD+UeyI +wdw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject :cc:to:from; bh=U2ooIY16mtA9AWTzEpAdH14Loq3rj68bs9AZb/9Zj6M=; b=w9fLTYkZCD5l9vbjay5CM6OLKqmVvVEzi7K2DzI7F9C2MrYLQfrlytfchANDWNbSly LQIo01Wku1dAWJEF64hDb0O2Rgo9V/TGoM6guPgGXGXKRXn6Wb6gBrQ4bT3rkqimkPt1 pm6DCgJEJACpX69vyfCeEOS/sK2iyfRGAJV0dARNBhdtnUy+u3b8erHnmNHnOZ9PUt9l adiEyMoyqKTkULQ2MjfEG/NQd7a1xt1VC/jPrkvt5kJczmiMoYrC6eH9t5OXndt+3ZrR ixxBz5PRQaDOPU2nuYZp4ARO88meStuhsUqcU6KDmqYShLgr7fycFVdjq55WWgig3+Bk 6/jA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=vivo.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l23si14174645ejq.537.2021.03.30.00.09.34; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:09:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=vivo.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231187AbhC3HGR (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 03:06:17 -0400 Received: from mail-m118208.qiye.163.com ([115.236.118.208]:40344 "EHLO mail-m118208.qiye.163.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230223AbhC3HF4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 03:05:56 -0400 Received: from vivo-HP-ProDesk-680-G4-PCI-MT.vivo.xyz (unknown [58.251.74.232]) by mail-m118208.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id B6735E02FA; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:05:49 +0800 (CST) From: Wang Qing To: Thomas Bogendoerfer , Adaptec OEM Raid Solutions , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Luis de Bethencourt , Salah Triki , David Woodhouse , Richard Weinberger , Ralf Baechle , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Wang Qing , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-decnet-user@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: [PATCH 6/6] net/decnet: Delete obsolete TODO file Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:02:49 +0800 Message-Id: <1617087773-7183-7-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1617087773-7183-1-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com> References: <1617087773-7183-1-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com> X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUtXWQgYFAkeWUFZS1VLWVdZKFlBSE83V1ktWUFJV1kPCR oVCBIfWUFZTk0fTkJNGE8eTExMVkpNSkxLQ0xCTktDTkhVEwETFhoSFyQUDg9ZV1kWGg8SFR0UWU FZT0tIVUpKS09ISFVLWQY+ X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6PCI6CAw*Tz8UAjcXPh88TgE8 Ej0aCk5VSlVKTUpMS0NMQk5KSkxKVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwKEhUcOw0SDRRVGBQWRVlXWRILWUFZTkNV SU5KVUxPVUlISVlXWQgBWUFPS0xNNwY+ X-HM-Tid: 0a7881f3eed02c17kusnb6735e02fa Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The TODO file here has not been updated from 2005, and the function development described in the file have been implemented or abandoned. Its existence will mislead developers seeking to view outdated information. Signed-off-by: Wang Qing --- net/decnet/TODO | 40 ---------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 40 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 net/decnet/TODO diff --git a/net/decnet/TODO b/net/decnet/TODO deleted file mode 100644 index 358e9eb..0000000 --- a/net/decnet/TODO +++ /dev/null @@ -1,40 +0,0 @@ -Steve's quick list of things that need finishing off: -[they are in no particular order and range from the trivial to the long winded] - - o Proper timeouts on each neighbour (in routing mode) rather than - just the 60 second On-Ethernet cache value. - - o Support for X.25 linklayer - - o Support for DDCMP link layer - - o The DDCMP device itself - - o PPP support (rfc1762) - - o Lots of testing with real applications - - o Verify errors etc. against POSIX 1003.1g (draft) - - o Using send/recvmsg() to get at connect/disconnect data (POSIX 1003.1g) - [maybe this should be done at socket level... the control data in the - send/recvmsg() calls should simply be a vector of set/getsockopt() - calls] - - o check MSG_CTRUNC is set where it should be. - - o Find all the commonality between DECnet and IPv4 routing code and extract - it into a small library of routines. [probably a project for 2.7.xx] - - o Add perfect socket hashing - an idea suggested by Paul Koning. Currently - we have a half-way house scheme which seems to work reasonably well, but - the full scheme is still worth implementing, its not not top of my list - right now. - - o Add session control message flow control - - o Add NSP message flow control - - o DECnet sendpages() function - - o AIO for DECnet -- 2.7.4