Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp4259183pxf; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 03:24:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwsNoe6VJGuc6B9XXq2ofILWwdjiqUxjMmj7sAZbMYtZWNu0GZSg2BBc0i56gOGo450TJG X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:76c7:: with SMTP id kf7mr32224855ejc.470.1617099880563; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 03:24:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617099880; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Imo9qIwzAIL9dMj1DERbPjWGxFYr/DyoSayWaXYZ7NJ2EFnkn3Eml4RATYO5oiXL9k 6d2GZbJbDySLduTtFPYZrj2ERlvr9qJdjRRox7SrvJ8BZv9pU/lOC/zXxMkQELDadBxZ FZyvMDvVdZ59zPUTCOQjRlgdpcDdxFPdqMpJtkJ4UNij9jztHcH/61C+0yN7FgcU1Zxr /FLRS5dblNn4IcsR5IVd3c9L9QmzIpha+TWmrb/uUtLaEeoJKA+TVrFfK/235ciiJeeW MsAlG30UeEAo59qtbglX6VBv8MVPtPxN/ty4xOphvBmVv9zuCwYV37c1LpJ/5aAVfCQa qYkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=EKrwJs1aZsXteeJpCf0K9AKsXvP4EXiM2vxWnhMYraE=; b=ODqPTb1i2OY+GcaIPSHndFai7uGkYyqglyyuYa/xxDWbQZwCfO2XKUvWLpIgVvd70a Zk1/DMFWsXVrhJmIdqjk6YCxXdbZLjcSUiP3GKQ5CGR4yKV3TZsYpYcvmrqlKXL23E48 HhxNPNIiPfg7ETS1pm+VOfxCr8NRKNXot8LK+hlLEkovA4jFuQdmI9/GRpoeu9zcc/zE ZFI3TGx3nBYg2bZ318QZYhPFPHnHVvFG0CM127i7J8oXVehnpu29A51WdJKM9fRNpqOm tQB92QMmavEP2BbK5QCBdA26HkxBjqLakf8dU/gNCabjw/lMs9QzH/QltV5pWWSmLwHZ iVtQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e9si14728426ejr.278.2021.03.30.03.24.18; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 03:24:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231835AbhC3KXX (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:23:23 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:56452 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231812AbhC3KWy (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:22:54 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9802ED1; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 03:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.57.89]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 288FC3F792; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 03:22:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:22:44 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Rob Herring , Sudeep.Holla@arm.com, Hector Yuan , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Matthias Brugger , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW Message-ID: <20210330102244.7dkzemtgrm7epmpv@bogus> References: <1615549235-27700-1-git-send-email-hector.yuan@mediatek.com> <1615549235-27700-3-git-send-email-hector.yuan@mediatek.com> <20210324160750.GA3154702@robh.at.kernel.org> <20210330025643.mbeb7oqumv75o3y5@vireshk-i7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210330025643.mbeb7oqumv75o3y5@vireshk-i7> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 08:26:43AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 24-03-21, 10:07, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:40:35PM +0800, Hector Yuan wrote: > > > From: "Hector.Yuan" > > > > > > Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan > > > --- > > > .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..0f3ad47 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml > > > @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > > +%YAML 1.2 > > > +--- > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml# > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > + > > > +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings > > > + > > > +maintainers: > > > + - Hector Yuan > > > + > > > +description: > > > + CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek > > > + SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency > > > + for multiple clusters. > > > + > > > +properties: > > > + compatible: > > > + const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw > > > + > > > + reg: > > > + minItems: 1 > > > + maxItems: 2 > > > + description: | > > > + Addresses and sizes for the memory of the > > > + HW bases in each frequency domain. > > > + > > > + "#performance-domain-cells": > > > > A common binding schema for this and 'performance-domains' needs to land > > first. > > Sudeep, what happened to the series you had on this ? This patchset > has been blocked for a long time now, can we get that merged soonish > somehow ? Sorry, it slipped through the cracks. I posted this as a fix for SCMI which we fixed it later. This got de-prioritised in my todo list. Sorry for that. I think main problem I had is to write a proper select statement in YAML scheme to check the DT nodes when it is present. I couldn't get anything similar for reference from clocks. I had "select: false" which I knew was not acceptable as it can't go throw dt_bindings_check. I am happy if someone wants to pick up and work on that to push the change or provide suggestions that I can try out. I am unable to spend more time trying to understand whole YAML schema ATM. -- Regards, Sudeep