Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Cc:     sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        keescook@chromium.org, anton@enomsg.org, ccross@android.com,
        tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        rdunlap@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/printk.c: Fixed mundane typos
In-Reply-To: <YGMevQvltf/LnJP1@alley>
References: <20210328043932.8310-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com> <YGMevQvltf/LnJP1@alley>
Date:   Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:53:52 +0200
Message-ID: <87mtuk4xb3.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On 2021-03-30, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> On Sun 2021-03-28 10:09:32, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>> 
>> s/sempahore/semaphore/
>> s/exacly/exactly/
>> s/unregistred/unregistered/
>> s/interation/iteration/
>> 
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
>
> John,
>
> it conflicts with the patchset removing printk safe buffers[1].
> Would you prefer to queue this into the patchset?
> Or should I push it into printk/linux.git, printk-rework and you would
> base v2 on top of it?

Go ahead and push it to printk-rework. I'll base v2 on top of it.

Thanks.

John