Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:07:40 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
To:     Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Cc:     Adaptec OEM Raid Solutions <aacraid@microsemi.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@kernel.org>,
        Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-decnet-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mips/sgi-ip27: Delete obsolete TODO file
Message-ID: <20210330130740.GA11217@alpha.franken.de>
References: <1617087773-7183-1-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com>
 <1617087773-7183-2-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1617087773-7183-2-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 03:02:44PM +0800, Wang Qing wrote:
> The TODO file here has not been updated for 15 years, and the function 
> development described in the file have been implemented or abandoned.
> 
> Its existence will mislead developers seeking to view outdated information.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
> ---
>  arch/mips/sgi-ip27/TODO | 19 -------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 arch/mips/sgi-ip27/TODO

applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]