Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp4481921pxf; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 08:51:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJySjG+dFx+8Rd2t1V/manrRZ2bZVgVMYdHvK0V8i7K+UbTc5EO8+s54zU8sYscpCBJrTOIo X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2955:: with SMTP id et21mr16508122ejc.448.1617119489772; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 08:51:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617119489; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eVAgdrC2voOQco/hTmAwr0QVl2uoe6ZC6XNSnGcA9yQ91SVrjytzIbUFVi115hj46R AtJtOK3azGpMJYfVTaUxsKj6ib4aFoVV1olJD23tvxHR0S8m3UUXSwA3oNJdGIggFQ+N ftwiqt0uIfpTW7tAKE8+UjcT9r4UT1e54gO7yFeFvh4NYvWoAo/8UN3eyy86MunexO5w KXMpD9N/C2CCS7mNA2+my2DeGC+vZgbkgVy/XmMXcDSmtgchOo82YCQRZeITBhkL5MIn eEk8VCy+cec0Xr11tKbUm3BUoBuJ2C4EQqlcbxM0OH7DQSDbzk/JKu2ywgoxkYRlv1WI ojLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=48g/gzaBSOpP8ysy0szvy5ViwJUMfGOD471xCPBHaOc=; b=UObxnzfscdxmoUyPkP54o2rbYaJhyGjPBO6mkwhE3sCEOrJ6Se0DY2dnwiPjFiZpR8 IegwdMK04o/XmdhXlrNXW9xR31oqVa2FRoCKzr03Wi37AyUSWBycpJ7cKtdqJG6ZtMk+ MmCnOPdRxsyDUtoDSt5N448xGobs9C2CTF98/FKlM73ZlEJYYxuXl6ntwVCtDI/DqyQL zr4gEDdgD/q38+VoIuC4AYn+yv+GIL09vqumRM30OjBfK7abApPKY/ab+vVMt95hbTvl yJqlLDjJcEKaU6UIfNyggm3KzLyy7S3eiVjIqJ0jORRoqReh4RtCeIb9COSIk5AWTqvO rj2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d24si15031010ejw.372.2021.03.30.08.51.06; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 08:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231942AbhC3Ptg (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:49:36 -0400 Received: from netrider.rowland.org ([192.131.102.5]:60125 "HELO netrider.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S231622AbhC3PtW (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:49:22 -0400 Received: (qmail 980943 invoked by uid 1000); 30 Mar 2021 11:49:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:49:21 -0400 From: Alan Stern To: Heikki Krogerus Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Benson Leung , Prashant Malani , Guenter Roeck , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] usb: Iterator for ports Message-ID: <20210330154921.GC980260@rowland.harvard.edu> References: <20210329084426.78138-1-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <20210329084426.78138-6-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <20210329184946.GA944482@rowland.harvard.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:07:35PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 02:49:46PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:44:25AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > > Introducing usb_for_each_port(). It works the same way as > > > usb_for_each_dev(), but instead of going through every USB > > > device in the system, it walks through the USB ports in the > > > system. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus > > > --- > > > drivers/usb/core/usb.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > include/linux/usb.h | 1 + > > > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/usb.c b/drivers/usb/core/usb.c > > > index 2ce3667ec6fae..62368c4ed37af 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/usb/core/usb.c > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/usb.c > > > @@ -398,6 +398,52 @@ int usb_for_each_dev(void *data, int (*fn)(struct usb_device *, void *)) > > > } > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_for_each_dev); > > > > > > +struct each_hub_arg { > > > + void *data; > > > + int (*fn)(struct device *, void *); > > > +}; > > > + > > > +static int __each_hub(struct usb_device *hdev, void *data) > > > +{ > > > + struct each_hub_arg *arg = (struct each_hub_arg *)data; > > > + struct usb_hub *hub; > > > + int ret = 0; > > > + int i; > > > + > > > + hub = usb_hub_to_struct_hub(hdev); > > > + if (!hub) > > > + return 0; > > > > What happens if the hub is removed exactly now? Although hdev is > > reference-counted (and the loop iterator does take a reference to it), > > usb_hub_to_struct_hub doesn't take a reference to hub. And hub->ports > > isn't refcounted at all. > > If the hub is removed right now, and if hub_disconnect() also manages > to remove the ports before we have time to take the lock below, then > hdev->maxchild will be 0 by the time we can take the lock. In that > case nothing happens here. Okay, good. > If on the other hand we manage to acquire the usb_port_peer_mutex > before hub_disconnect(), then hub_disconnect() will simply have to > wait until we are done, and only after that remove the ports. > > > > + mutex_lock(&usb_port_peer_mutex); > > > + > > > + for (i = 0; i < hdev->maxchild; i++) { > > > + ret = arg->fn(&hub->ports[i]->dev, arg->data); > > > + if (ret) > > > + break; > > > + } > > > + > > > + mutex_unlock(&usb_port_peer_mutex); > > > > I have a feeling that it would be better to take and release this mutex > > in usb_for_each_port (or its caller), so that it is held over the whole > > loop. > > I disagree. The lock is for the ports, not the hubs. We should take > the lock when we are going through the ports of a hub, but release it > between the hubs. Otherwise we will be only keeping things on hold for > a long period of time for no good reason (I for example have to > evaluate the _PLD of every single port which takes a lot of time). We > don't need to prevent other things from happening to the hubs at the > same time. All right, you convinced me. Acked-by: Alan Stern Alan Stern