Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 07:11:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 07:11:18 -0500 Received: from leeor.math.technion.ac.il ([132.68.115.2]:22446 "EHLO leeor.math.technion.ac.il") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 07:11:09 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 14:10:58 +0200 (IST) From: "Zvi Har'El" To: Arjan van de Ven cc: , "Nadav Har'El" Subject: Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs In-Reply-To: <3BEA6725.739463C2@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > The basic idea is "everything which can be a module will be a module", > even scsi is a module. And if you use grub, it's 100% transparent as the > initrd > will be automatically added to the grub config when you install the RH > kernel rpm; > even if you use lilo the initrd is supposed to be made for you Is there no overhead (except in boot time) in using initrd? If there is, and ext3fs becomes the normative fs, IMHO ext3 should be part of the kernel, and not an add-on. Thanks, Zvi. -- Dr. Zvi Har'El mailto:rl@math.technion.ac.il Department of Mathematics tel:+972-54-227607 Technion - Israel Institute of Technology fax:+972-4-8324654 http://www.math.technion.ac.il/~rl/ Haifa 32000, ISRAEL "If you can't say somethin' nice, don't say nothin' at all." -- Thumper (1942) Thursday, 22 Heshvan 5762, 8 November 2001, 2:07PM - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/