Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932617AbWJJKvW (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:51:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932623AbWJJKvW (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:51:22 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:63910 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932617AbWJJKvV (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:51:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:50:56 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Stefan Seyfried , Jiri Kosina , linux-acpi@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] preserve correct battery state through suspend/resume cycles Message-ID: <20061010105056.GC30881@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20060930114817.GA26217@suse.de> <20061008184230.GC4033@ucw.cz> <200610100052.10008.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200610100052.10008.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2309 Lines: 49 On Tue 2006-10-10 00:52:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, 8 October 2006 20:42, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > > boot -> suspend -> (un)plug battery -> resume > > > > > > > > The problem arises in both cases - i.e. suspend with battery plugged in, > > > > and resume with battery unplugged, or vice versa. > > > > > > > > After resume, when the battery status has changed (plugged in -> unplegged > > > > or unplugged -> plugged in) during the time when the system was sleeping, > > > > the /proc/acpi/battery/*/* is wrong (showing the state before suspend, not > > > > the current state). > > > > > > Is this also needed if you use "platform" method? Also with suspend-to-RAM? > > > > > > > The following patch adds ->resume method to the ACPI battery handler, which > > > > has the only aim - to check whether the battery state has changed during sleep, > > > > and if so, update the ACPI internal data structures, so that information > > > > published through /proc/acpi/battery/*/* is correct even after suspend/resume > > > > cycle, during which the battery was removed/inserted. > > > > > > Although it generally is a good idea to add suspend and resume methods to > > > all ACPI drivers, it would be interesting to know if you still need this > > > when using the correct method (platform) instead of the incorrect default > > > method (shutdown). > > > > > > echo "platform" > /sys/power/disk > > > echo "disk" > /sys/power/state > > > > Maybe we should change the default in 2.6.20 or so? > > Well, I think swsusp should work with "shutdown" just as well. If it doesn't, > that means there are some bugs in the ACPI code which should be fixed. > By using "platform" as the default method we'll be hiding those bugs IMHO. > > OTOH that may be desirable. ;-) You are right. We probably want both: suspend/resume method in battery driver _and_ platform mode used by default. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/