Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MW2PR2101MB08924CD74C6EB773C4D5FAFDBF7E9@MW2PR2101MB0892.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAJZ5v0g+=AnRAmAAn8NpHm8bmZ1WkwDpjb5rr_zPOVABW1PYug@mail.gmail.com> <4e95307db43e2f7cc8516e645b81db7db0dd8ad4.camel@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4e95307db43e2f7cc8516e645b81db7db0dd8ad4.camel@redhat.com>
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 30 Mar 2021 21:45:18 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXHg2RDgwmOhJkaAPoWeHpxnd6tixp94Kha1-bzNvCaQUg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fix hibernation in FIPS mode?
To:     Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
        "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "crecklin@redhat.com" <crecklin@redhat.com>,
        "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 20:05, Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 16:46 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:14 AM Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > MD5 was marked incompliant with FIPS in 2009:
> > > a3bef3a31a19 ("crypto: testmgr - Skip algs not flagged fips_allowed in fips mode")
> > > a1915d51e8e7 ("crypto: testmgr - Mark algs allowed in fips mode")
> > >
> > > But hibernation_e820_save() is still using MD5, and fails in FIPS mode
> > > due to the 2018 patch:
> > > 749fa17093ff ("PM / hibernate: Check the success of generating md5 digest before hibernation")
> > >
> > > As a result, hibernation doesn't work when FIPS is on.
> > >
> > > Do you think if hibernation_e820_save() should be changed to use a
> > > FIPS-compliant algorithm like SHA-1?
> >
> > I would say yes, it should.
> >
> > > PS, currently it looks like FIPS mode is broken in the mainline:
> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org/msg49414.html
>
>
> FYI, SHA-1 is not a good choice, it is only permitted in HMAC
> constructions and only for specified uses. If you need to change
> algorithm you should go straight to SHA-2 or SHA-3 based hashes.
>

What is the reason for using a [broken] cryptographic hash here? if
this is just an integrity check, better use CRC32