Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 1/2] mISDN: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Message-Id: <161713741108.14455.9996520147767264569.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 30 Mar 2021 20:50:11 +0000
References: <20210330022416.528300-1-liushixin2@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210330022416.528300-1-liushixin2@huawei.com>
To:     Shixin Liu <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Cc:     isdn@linux-pingi.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:24:14 +0800 you wrote:
> spinlock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_SPINLOCK()
> rather than explicitly calling spin_lock_init().
> 
> Changelog:
> From v1:
> 1. fix the mistake reported by kernel test robot.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [-next,v2,1/2] mISDN: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/77053fb7b428
  - [-next,v2,2/2] mISDN: Use LIST_HEAD() for list_head
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/5979415d00d4

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html