Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965155AbWJJMTz (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 08:19:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964793AbWJJMTz (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 08:19:55 -0400 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:53181 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965155AbWJJMTx (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 08:19:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 08:19:50 -0400 From: Theodore Tso To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc1-mm1 Message-ID: <20061010121950.GA25809@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20061010000928.9d2d519a.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061010000928.9d2d519a.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1877 Lines: 45 On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 12:09:28AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > - Added the ext4 filesystem. Quick usage instructions: > > - Grab updated e2fsprogs from > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/e2fsprogs-interim/ > > - It's still mke2fs -j /dev/hda1 > > - mount /dev/hda1 /wherever -t ext4dev > > - To enable extents, > > mount /dev/hda1 /wherever -t ext4dev -o extents Looks like you didn't take the updated patch from Shaggy which requires that you use tune2fs -O extents first? (This requires the e2fsprogs-interim patches.) The plan is that mount -o extents is not going to be the long-term way that extents will be enabled. I can imagine a -o noextents option, which might be used with remount to do an on-line rollback from extents to non-extents, but normally you shouldn't need to use a mount option to enable a feature that are filesystem format-related. Those should be implied by the appropriate flags in the superblock. Mount -o nobh is a different story, since that's just a implementation detail --- although for ext4, maybe we should just make nobh a default, since that way more people will test it and hopefully, eventually nobh will be the only way of doing things, right? > Making the journal larger than the mke2fs default often helps > performance with metadata-intensive workloads. The default was increased significantly in e2fsprogs 1.40; if someone who has their favorite metadata-intesive benchmark could test and see if we should be using even larger defaults for certain "mke2fs -T " configurations, I'd really appreciate it. - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/