Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp12755pxf; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:06:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdF2Fp9A1/uap8UyjShi1zBdvq+ICquKPUaDmi5Wz690uS/cAYRwJQjmHQda9+/+dEjhSk X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:51cd:: with SMTP id r13mr6464858edd.116.1617228400639; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:06:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617228400; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IbcwkEDu3iccdjsvCDRx3Vc8UfUWcXW7kzTKEZbS4gyxU2EuJNQ+UQC34ITOK9wEC6 Jn6Qo6nNQ5xkZ3ihiwjPjWwbjdzwWCENtedcE6v02pBEGBRiFkSH419aiVDI6075bjCa Cb8BpUiSIuzHwnSNiFzB7DyIV0ENmsM3bJI4AlXP8Tocu0J7kWFZ92dJ2sDm610T8E9Y Wd7VqUqHSSltHsvSevfQZ3rRAjiRiTh4JMNoOc6KUIUx4V19FXTXuMK+J79p8Dvv4MxT BtxQvz5uHbShsm/XFIuw5J4gdkIl+MrP3S7JsW1kt58a2OqZ4founKqyrnhkIqYPXRy+ JwyA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=0s80tVd1/+xxWvcVo0goiNeMZ99Cty098sGMsWOUfWA=; b=PFy1g/AZIF/FJs7xlhl8Yip9fDy2stWot0GxgXSa8WAqXoMDqiAI2GkxWljb9QzLHT fSKTq6gjgYFhjRo8C3T6MZugVQpMzSSzpYh5JMmgJrNTRtxtM+6SbAyAxt42SNDIOr+1 zIaJ9ESUwC3m8/YeA7LaJruRzHClu55CVrDSxVUv+iq6H3XkVGV+bOLOj+XahDk9cwuW 6wzbiq36m9hDhkJ3wOLE0dzPCYXseZA8FzZnGlUbI/b8FJaIGBbYF3iUccXzsjYSBn36 MDi7nI76l+6GH/rWb6PBjMRBhLxWNBMMSHZyVE2lHVc1tsBP/v2TtVpVxV/96ZnZDVzr 42dQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=gMd8e2A2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p17si2893461edy.508.2021.03.31.15.06.06; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:06:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=gMd8e2A2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229615AbhCaWDt (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 18:03:49 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:4788 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229787AbhCaWDb (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 18:03:31 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 12VLYOGV115406; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 18:03:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=0s80tVd1/+xxWvcVo0goiNeMZ99Cty098sGMsWOUfWA=; b=gMd8e2A2WI19C72rRErzSgE+xcF0p/AHUSWZz7Y/rTUqBzK42r7yU4qaQBBRqWqwUpj9 Ig24PhBcbsp6DpcFccAiTuak0Os9aobR9yPISnIE5g4sbSvp9pOBdAsVWAR6PZ0QMVpp afjV7zYV9NP8CuYGpNktfBCiz5sY6gpdBe+e7o6ao1PY+hEqQ5D9Stvu1saBfNayLr87 h3k6GbLXes7nEyzcanRKgKc+HBUsZvF2ehG+S+YRc22zwXeBbRlaNPLPwrbzhiGQugFr lj4/ivczJeQzMiL6u2hpPTAFQeC9iGR8NCo0JUg7NG7d26kO235MJfDVl15jyE0jovON Bw== Received: from ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (6c.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.108]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 37mnfte6wm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 18:03:03 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 12VM2UhQ007893; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:03:01 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 37marxggjy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:03:01 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 12VM2xM536766040 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:02:59 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25143A4051; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:02:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5F8A4040; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:02:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.171.77.178]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:02:58 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 00:02:57 +0200 From: Vasily Gorbik To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Josef Bacik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: User stacktrace garbage when USER_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT is not enabled Message-ID: References: <20210331103749.01a7c283@gandalf.local.home> <20210331170900.5f41bcd7@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210331170900.5f41bcd7@gandalf.local.home> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: xjcwSAf-x6Rd-Llh7mXPrt6UEX5AQwi1 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: xjcwSAf-x6Rd-Llh7mXPrt6UEX5AQwi1 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369,18.0.761 definitions=2021-03-31_10:2021-03-31,2021-03-31 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=980 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2103300000 definitions=main-2103310148 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 05:09:00PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 22:51:15 +0200 > Vasily Gorbik wrote: > > > It does! Thanks for the explanation and for the fix. I wonder why nobody > > noticed and complained about that since v5.6. > > Because it didn't lose data, just added extra junk. > > > > > Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik > > Want to give a "tested-by" too? I only tested it on s390 (manually + ftrace selftest), quite frankly. If it qualifies: Tested-by: Vasily Gorbik # s390 only