Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932198AbWJJTI0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:08:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932240AbWJJTI0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:08:26 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.191]:42078 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932198AbWJJTIZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:08:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=sxrs23Uw3je4vpgoFprwULHtrt4rubqfad+QYSccIXzgbcLCGdzsilTO7XkqCggtCTU4pdwF+CgqUffNxGVHhbDKgfJ7YdH1ib2mnwZQKBvHBm1YqMsgCuw92bJSmUjE9dbLi1HOo78CBX8E10h9OW8U7s1duu2ahSpiC+BHIAY= Subject: Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Riss To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Pavel Machek , Linux Kernel list , len.brown@intel.com In-Reply-To: References: <1160417982.5142.45.camel@funkylaptop> <20061010103910.GD31598@elf.ucw.cz> <1160476889.3000.282.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:08:15 +0200 Message-Id: <1160507296.5134.4.camel@funkylaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1006 Lines: 25 Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 à 08:33 -0700, Linus Torvalds a écrit : > > If we do this we probably should at least key this of some DMI > > identification for the mac mini.. > > No. That would be silly. > > Having _conditional_ code is not only bigger, it's orders of magnitude > more complex and likely to break. It's much better to say: "We know at > least one machine needs this" than it is to say "We know machine X needs > this", because the latter has extra complexity that just doesn't buy you > anything. > > It's much better to treat everybody the same, if that works. That way, you > don't have different code-paths. So what's the plan? Should/Will the ACPI guys remove the bit-preserving change brought in with the latest ACPICA merge? Fred. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/