Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Xu Jia <xujia39@huawei.com>
To:     <davem@davemloft.net>, <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
        <dsahern@kernel.org>, <kuba@kernel.org>
CC:     <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Xu Jia <xujia39@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: ipv6: Refactor in rt6_age_examine_exception
Date:   Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:22:23 +0800
Message-ID: <1617247343-48200-1-git-send-email-xujia39@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

The logic in rt6_age_examine_exception is confusing. The commit is
to refactor the code.

Signed-off-by: Xu Jia <xujia39@huawei.com>
---
 net/ipv6/route.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index ebb7519bec2a..f15c7605b11d 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -2085,13 +2085,10 @@ static void rt6_age_examine_exception(struct rt6_exception_bucket *bucket,
 
 	if (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_GATEWAY) {
 		struct neighbour *neigh;
-		__u8 neigh_flags = 0;
 
 		neigh = __ipv6_neigh_lookup_noref(rt->dst.dev, &rt->rt6i_gateway);
-		if (neigh)
-			neigh_flags = neigh->flags;
 
-		if (!(neigh_flags & NTF_ROUTER)) {
+		if (!(neigh && (neigh->flags & NTF_ROUTER))) {
 			RT6_TRACE("purging route %p via non-router but gateway\n",
 				  rt);
 			rt6_remove_exception(bucket, rt6_ex);
-- 
2.25.1