Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     pbonzini@redhat.com, wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com,
        joro@8bytes.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
        bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix potential memory access error
In-Reply-To: <YGS6XS87HYJdVPFQ@google.com>
References: <1617182122-112315-1-git-send-email-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
 <YGS6XS87HYJdVPFQ@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:08:13 +0200
Message-ID: <87mtuis77m.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021, Yang Li wrote:
>> Using __set_bit() to set a bit in an integer is not a good idea, since
>> the function expects an unsigned long as argument, which can be 64bit wide.
>> Coverity reports this problem as
>> 
>> High:Out-of-bounds access(INCOMPATIBLE_CAST)
>> CWE119: Out-of-bounds access to a scalar
>> Pointer "&vcpu->arch.regs_avail" points to an object whose effective
>> type is "unsigned int" (32 bits, unsigned) but is dereferenced as a
>> wider "unsigned long" (64 bits, unsigned). This may lead to memory
>> corruption.
>> 
>> /home/heyuan.shy/git-repo/linux/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h:
>> kvm_register_is_available
>> 
>> Just use BIT instead.
>
> Meh, we're hosed either way.  Using BIT() will either result in undefined
> behavior due to SHL shifting beyond the size of a u64, or setting random bits
> if the truncated shift ends up being less than 63.
>

A stupid question: why can't we just make 'regs_avail'/'regs_dirty'
'unsigned long' and drop a bunch of '(unsigned long *)' casts? 

-- 
Vitaly