Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp1152484pxf; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 02:41:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8Fai239uo8J1WLd0Bwfvlh+NpoWbm6WN28Qinmj+vzyj5qSdskvKsKCtuYAU9xMmT8imk X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6f14:: with SMTP id k20mr10628924ioc.52.1617356505984; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 02:41:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617356505; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hsxSJRyjxy9lyDUVTcc4HdAlLMn+vym+7PK+ZmJSafM8z6fx/Fzhg07nl+39Ethgg6 eK6mjYoog0IQJpqqwi9kwj+LqVziu+vOhZGybDvOmNBVg5350+FggONE9kGyVNH/nlfp BXcJTp3dsub6NlEdhvWKWWBtRBbZb2ebD2SFsR59Uf/lE6qNIsMixCg6s7OGRZoJ+mdB yxA5mE32KVkTNzxDrNx6yQUt9xKTUNN9PudXayVh7qUEwtMDMWt5dTe0+JJkB+xu206q LqnpSbHesXLP7wlwhHwGS0ZN0sSrkgELzUiv+8qdhKIfEwMimG2fK4dmathS80zdgMf6 Z43g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=NpfJ7ZDCsL19dq39DZU8Zv+kNBnx+3lvoUY6iHvhzLo=; b=y/nttgZCMocjtZv3oI8VekJ9VVtoFYt3wQKAUaXx0awQIBFQaOhlf6rMXhmp5RyxQw iJN8o0Yp8LEUNn2AkkZY1tx2KOVY3AXRIeXdl+sZe/WRWu4Hc2EG7q6HYen8vtXEJ35Y /Jzv96LawtryTZdyJ7mXNLrfurn9TemXgjvYzO/UNG0WOACSRLn5PA/NAqhVr3q+aksr b9hZiGNoL5PgT2AKJw8KPql6TtT9zdnk+pb/a13OMNVbLt7JAHjuYMryZHdonOaybbJV b03+g/zH1cRaxWDId801uzK99G2yYGUyMciyEjTkC/CKWYD1Lz3hZ9LAPD2PhvsYMkHq UPQw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="nZ/aoOT7"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j10si7206116ils.86.2021.04.02.02.41.31; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 02:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="nZ/aoOT7"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234856AbhDBJk7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Apr 2021 05:40:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40112 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234482AbhDBJk5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2021 05:40:57 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA1BC0613E6; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 02:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id r193so1906323ior.9; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 02:40:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NpfJ7ZDCsL19dq39DZU8Zv+kNBnx+3lvoUY6iHvhzLo=; b=nZ/aoOT7fuDONxs8HFnvIWfKJaJK51Zva46kyAvGnIMwidBbKBzlkk2gsmj++BISZO F8XZUaiCCLN6/04DmxBI0e5zYCZ66WhQawVIHWEJmU5ovypVxr1u1SAyB6ev/dGDvQrB 14lK3pRFbZPcP1xxQKH679gvcHxOPd1OZ2X1UefH/z6Z4XH0wujTz55GfO8fJSIDjWY2 GvcGcDiz0i4g+UulGa3vNI1PtwT0KYEygyWvup098qM+gOrcHgHDFRbrcnMbfBfawAyV Hk2T3AQblyZl252l+SzH4l7jgTYTdlPaiKf0QSvxIYiIhFu/EzQbOD1SzNzpBnXcTu4T puog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NpfJ7ZDCsL19dq39DZU8Zv+kNBnx+3lvoUY6iHvhzLo=; b=ER6uDKjCVkRigLB82PQy68buBZJ4UgSt22UG4rwRZNSLGOzS5x9QgNdbd29yEGDFR0 gX1NZ3dVT3JM5cLshXpiAPgqVUY+/j635HjeHQGm8gMuxn/RtAZcJwWB3bFxyNfXMn3L yZqtwn26WkS4gfc0DKnI8xBKYUW76QlmMVpCQoEfCT/n8zcDAebjwTpIWHON/AVmpq2X /kGYikIfsLKaI0G+WateD0Da04QFBDmLnVbQlFo5tbzQQWGeGNvllZncEq3h3TXJ6DGF i01HJxMuJDW4dF/rE7CC0+vbFFfKn+bx/02fygEvdUCxjumpnVVKr+AEo3AMBBfFCPva t4Mw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531rR/YdxOTTOGu5Zg3uXz0Isoa/WyC5LvWbB1cYVSlVn6GQKXun vWdALAR0r0I+1/OEo2wbzlLd+mdmmds/5bsOD50= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:ec7:: with SMTP id q7mr12109057jas.54.1617356456649; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 02:40:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4c259d34b5943bf384fd3cb0d98eccf798a34f0f.1615038553.git.syednwaris@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Syed Nayyar Waris Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 15:10:37 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] gpio: xilinx: Utilize generic bitmap_get_value and _set_value To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Andy Shevchenko , William Breathitt Gray , Michal Simek , Arnd Bergmann , Robert Richter , Linus Walleij , Masahiro Yamada , Andrew Morton , "Zhang, Rui" , Daniel Lezcano , Amit Kucheria , Linux-Arch , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm Mailing List , Linux PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:27 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 4:08 PM Syed Nayyar Waris wrote: > > > > This patch reimplements the xgpio_set_multiple() function in > > drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c to use the new generic functions: > > bitmap_get_value() and bitmap_set_value(). The code is now simpler > > to read and understand. Moreover, instead of looping for each bit > > in xgpio_set_multiple() function, now we can check each channel at > > a time and save cycles. > > ... > > > + u32 *const state = chip->gpio_state; > > + unsigned int *const width = chip->gpio_width; > > > + > > Extra blank line. > > > + DECLARE_BITMAP(old, 64); > > + DECLARE_BITMAP(new, 64); > > + DECLARE_BITMAP(changed, 64); > > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[0], flags); > > + spin_lock(&chip->gpio_lock[1]); > > I understand why this is done at the top of the function in the original code. > I do not understand why you put some operations under spin lock. > > Have you checked what each of these spin locks protects? > Please check and try to lock as minimum as possible. > > > + bitmap_set_value(old, 64, state[0], width[0], 0); > > + bitmap_set_value(old, 64, state[1], width[1], width[0]); > > + bitmap_replace(new, old, bits, mask, gc->ngpio); > > + > > + bitmap_set_value(old, 64, state[0], 32, 0); > > + bitmap_set_value(old, 64, state[1], 32, 32); > > + state[0] = bitmap_get_value(new, 0, width[0]); > > + state[1] = bitmap_get_value(new, width[0], width[1]); > > + bitmap_set_value(new, 64, state[0], 32, 0); > > + bitmap_set_value(new, 64, state[1], 32, 32); > > + bitmap_xor(changed, old, new, 64); > > Original code and this is cryptic. Can you add a few comments > explaining what is going on here? > > > + spin_unlock(&chip->gpio_lock[1]); > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[0], flags); > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko Have removed the extra line and added comments. Regarding locking - I see that now there is just a single lock available instead of 2 locks. Have made necessary changes. Thanks https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c?id=37ef334680800263b32bb96a5156a4b47f0244a2 Regards Syed Nayyar Waris