Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 2 Apr 2021 14:56:26 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To:     Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
Cc:     gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, joe@perches.com,
        linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] staging: rtl8723bs: remove RT_TRACE logs in
 core/rtw_xmit.c
Message-ID: <20210402115626.GV2088@kadam>
References: <cover.1617356821.git.fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
 <72ab5222629f912ca2dbe825d194108992d321e7.1617356821.git.fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <72ab5222629f912ca2dbe825d194108992d321e7.1617356821.git.fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:01:21PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> @@ -568,20 +561,11 @@ static s32 update_attrib_sec_info(struct adapter *padapter, struct pkt_attrib *p
>  	if (pattrib->encrypt > 0)
>  		memcpy(pattrib->dot118021x_UncstKey.skey, psta->dot118021x_UncstKey.skey, 16);
>  
> -	RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_xmit_c_, _drv_info_,
> -		("update_attrib: encrypt =%d  securitypriv.sw_encrypt =%d\n",
> -		pattrib->encrypt, padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt));
> -
>  	if (pattrib->encrypt &&
> -		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
> +		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt) || (!psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted)))

You've done too much clean up here.  Just remove the { but leave the
== true/false comparisons.

If the patch is only changing five lines or code then fixing checkpatch
warnings on the line of code you are changing is fine, but in this case
you're doing a bunch of changes and these sort of cleanups make it hard
to review.

Ease to spot that the curly brace changed:
-		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
+		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false)))

Hard to spot:
-		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt == true) || (psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted == false))) {
+		((padapter->securitypriv.sw_encrypt) || (!psecuritypriv->hw_decrypted)))

regards,
dan carpenter