Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp1571105pxf; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 14:45:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyx0Gy0yyM2mPBDCOqkiWNiyYMaPF9uRPoTEeyu5t6aQ0WzmCNOPM7b8JAlwhywP0QFGtVx X-Received: by 2002:a92:c611:: with SMTP id p17mr12008395ilm.54.1617399923355; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 14:45:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617399923; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PNzquewxX0RdXXzutmC2S4uFvQFLeZvtV21k/f7Sh407+aDw/JbD2t/GLSpAogkBHr YJvl9hl6yCLaa0d9H28wOkHfPza5v+S08ZUTuxji7Dk0CS1J7nFeYx9IfPjhU7xTBlgy tybklmpLOnxntFMjXBH5Z/uPxaCDLPeX2ZmlEUC631lWzWvfRx1SkjgteWa56lk6LTL4 VYdmW69y3cmLkVmO4liUB8KmcxxSO6viJbOgEi+m73sCKn2E2nPBhIkPirwhrig9nC1N K9+XLPIgEW4WrvOeH/JDc6mAK5/rRy2ad3aXg2FaEoUg5mPq9wHbHAg+xyE837qsaGws EQhg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=0Adice11UwmWvW+U6T9ZhShvoUX7I0FtvMtpHfXTd0g=; b=SOTExOOflo7jU+x8ZOrYfxwdGJiKqzotuQdP/+7eLOoIeHK6hPT4EUS9OEYmO84sxy MZHdx8/VnIX2NCluWZOS0j3F74I3qj7gitmHjykOBH45MCyYl9CD+GKKVwPnwcuDmBDl W+3j9Z9Mrbxb2JOJt1xlsjoNm4iym6wQXYdpv+75iaJK6ZlntsdxoEMBfz4ZX+uCvnUF +7exeC5Yl4c/QZVnBLrjZQ0QOaH4PW11bHWJ5hyJ9e3R8jOPcO5jLwoY5sUoWzRDQSZi 804jOONzYJRlq8e7ooBSBYSB0cZDid4I/uOo3+4Br0nzifbDSVEBTaM3nai06nEX7hGc NQdw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=google header.b=RbULyQYr; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b11si10249284ilj.146.2021.04.02.14.45.09; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 14:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=google header.b=RbULyQYr; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229722AbhDBVoy (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Apr 2021 17:44:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55830 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231406AbhDBVox (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2021 17:44:53 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9505C061788 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 14:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id o15so1484270ilf.11 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 14:44:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0Adice11UwmWvW+U6T9ZhShvoUX7I0FtvMtpHfXTd0g=; b=RbULyQYrBgZJQYCm10LOck1E5A+jgyKNlyofQgXi2+mN/UN2+r1i7PV4/z6oaj2VIy xkOUHWl0YOdc+O1oogQ2HJSsNwGom5/H/2Qzdsp4OmIaLw66UWvCWzocOguK/OcZ4DFe bFPXGnoqdv2YkrE9KtBII5vn8ho+AtQLiK7ws= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0Adice11UwmWvW+U6T9ZhShvoUX7I0FtvMtpHfXTd0g=; b=FWXYow7+tVQmGUvUGXq5zibUlrsvEWNE6a39BO3VO1Fxf03uHEPHr/DrCE1FO75cYg eoKZJZomh6YevmBOezUCHVf2ThXcesK4njzu2MYcXVGlliAkCanVnLuJGy6ahb1o/EDJ DEWIeXDC6x+7TNVoSXrh6ALSJywVnolVFo0YTafk3ftW1UBNm+WLt4AiK1E3r6pY6pns hhmTFnUz+pku4xSeurxRfSc3tdS3vodL2ISsSYStVC+nXJko6Tmb7A94M3WfiFfAUAon enmJvzSrqHqCAmZCHJJ8OCR7yQp6WL1tN3U/J+KdwpYcEYGI71nmMHkfu7sTuifqykvx CUZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QXcqDpZ89+8xoz88WF0WI0KkvxGhR/Mcql3qxoaZTqG/+kw62 4Tvjci2IEZ1s0OrkLrcYc11i1w== X-Received: by 2002:a92:d382:: with SMTP id o2mr13044404ilo.94.1617399891285; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 14:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.112] (c-24-9-64-241.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [24.9.64.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f9sm5111049iol.23.2021.04.02.14.44.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Apr 2021 14:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] kunit: support failure from dynamic analysis tools To: Daniel Latypov Cc: Brendan Higgins , David Gow , Alan Maguire , Linux Kernel Mailing List , KUnit Development , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Uriel Guajardo , Shuah Khan References: <20210311152314.3814916-1-dlatypov@google.com> <20210311152314.3814916-2-dlatypov@google.com> <16fe1cc0-5819-986d-9065-433a80783edb@linuxfoundation.org> From: Shuah Khan Message-ID: <3774e8c7-4183-d627-8c53-16bdc0bed6eb@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 15:44:50 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/2/21 3:25 PM, Daniel Latypov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 10:53 AM Shuah Khan wrote: >> >> On 4/2/21 2:55 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:23 AM Daniel Latypov wrote: >>>> >>>> From: Uriel Guajardo >>>> >>>> Add a kunit_fail_current_test() function to fail the currently running >>>> test, if any, with an error message. >>>> >>>> This is largely intended for dynamic analysis tools like UBSAN and for >>>> fakes. >>>> E.g. say I had a fake ops struct for testing and I wanted my `free` >>>> function to complain if it was called with an invalid argument, or >>>> caught a double-free. Most return void and have no normal means of >>>> signalling failure (e.g. super_operations, iommu_ops, etc.). >>>> >>>> Key points: >>>> * Always update current->kunit_test so anyone can use it. >>>> * commit 83c4e7a0363b ("KUnit: KASAN Integration") only updated it for >>>> CONFIG_KASAN=y >>>> >>>> * Create a new header so non-test code doesn't have >>>> to include all of (e.g. lib/ubsan.c) >>>> >>>> * Forward the file and line number to make it easier to track down >>>> failures >>>> >>>> * Declare the helper function for nice __printf() warnings about mismatched >>>> format strings even when KUnit is not enabled. >>>> >>>> Example output from kunit_fail_current_test("message"): >>>> [15:19:34] [FAILED] example_simple_test >>>> [15:19:34] # example_simple_test: initializing >>>> [15:19:34] # example_simple_test: lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:24: message >>>> [15:19:34] not ok 1 - example_simple_test >>>> >>>> Co-developed-by: Daniel Latypov >>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov >>>> Signed-off-by: Uriel Guajardo >>>> Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins >>> >> >> Please run checkpatch on your patches in the future. I am seeing >> a few checkpatch readability type improvements that can be made. >> >> Please make changes and send v2 with Brendan's Reviewed-by. > > Thanks for the catch. > checkpatch.pl --strict should now be happy (aside from complaining > about line wrapping) > > v5 here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210402212131.835276-1-dlatypov@google.com > > Note: Brendan didn't give an explicit Reviewed-by on the second patch, > not sure if that was intentional. > No worries. I applied this one as well. I was able to fix it with just checkpatch --fix option. All set now. thanks, -- Shuah