Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp1859753pxf; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 02:51:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyNJuXhQIbNZl0k+d6jdaYzO9EkJ7Xcu62Fk301DWOxHmyXcim7jjZLCSs9UspS542gX52q X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:524e:: with SMTP id t14mr20468207edd.371.1617443490710; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 02:51:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617443490; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FKTm+WbrvZFNr4fdIO3jO7v6Tc8Y7p5TIyJnYlkm98501xnZHqeyKf/7eSkVmm1sRJ VfpWgeNeBo5g3aKER2jYnhW6XpJIlZ9X7nNYPK4+4Qxqxd+yugNogNjCCPC08K8lWaKk XVR8cxdwg8JjzNay63B1/gLQWxLjE6kT20A1cGryWAyyGYV9+9MoyOpZHXu0C04yKSvx KVqXqJRrz8WpBc/p1FDDVs8KQ+WQYt+l2TjwjNoDrT4fUbCOVgMYimGh86hNNntZMgdp cUmgqpVvmByul1PBBXnh9w7AiQj/4+WdX5bJjq+1kueFZ01IddFLIVwVD6DtalALXqTt WYEA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=BsuX244Qwo5U14rjmt302Jci2DoZxQVAfqhH3h6HqLE=; b=g4HGtbdfuQzWboV+QNWE6IpvFX7u420QWh+sWYdIbSKwO2GU+mvkOe5C9gAepy14jO xQMKfki3gS0qB6jQ42J9nEsU9luCt0r2X+ZXy7VZ2Luc1oUWGDMNo8Hb5WMQ33owFLBY EhmF7c8ZD7A5K8Uj6o2JCJk2JsPjahdmJF3M8TA4Y2i61M1WLYJ3y9qOPkwwiNUiUSuM ZRurIXpfMHzo9vYvtz3UtiN3iBXRKnPsPpVhh7Q40ZfrEQ2otpZwOODelPBV9G32fvh/ uLSz2F/Stgn3alXbzSQYKuuf7Ba46tw/q0bhFsCr7SC6Gu4uRpX+E+L1sQSg/3pkm/H1 CbBw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="E/Y+lZfd"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l26si7959050ejc.536.2021.04.03.02.51.05; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 02:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="E/Y+lZfd"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233277AbhDCJul (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 3 Apr 2021 05:50:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41384 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232178AbhDCJui (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Apr 2021 05:50:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7559C0613E6 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 02:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id q26so897850wrz.9 for ; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 02:50:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=BsuX244Qwo5U14rjmt302Jci2DoZxQVAfqhH3h6HqLE=; b=E/Y+lZfdQok49SrEQ0ilEV83pkM0lBsRaVK4hSZWm2uuJja8OO+6SEKBfvCinRi173 GOSdXrvumuOIM374gfHoI/7UX2JKxSozXhueTsMElNqu7LqCZeNPy0X5BDbDjEbeYzF9 FJFr4bP2eOJjz+pp27ZHwNkkANcYAv9kFuSFXhAk4WssKRB8wrlr9BCRxdVYNL2jtDaz Wh/T62sv7aEexAX1qjLCQtSeo3fzeceBAQ/6qpOGoxCnkArTEz8tzz7qnn1GuJj06CyF vBoZrkVXXvnW48j3/hYxgD7oxwXqTWXVKshJwuHQu6T9NpZERBuEKBxzlSWAxW5PI28Z Y4dg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=BsuX244Qwo5U14rjmt302Jci2DoZxQVAfqhH3h6HqLE=; b=EhIQeJycWB0vlZKLxx0hjCEVM2boLqb2HUPaQ2KDXL1+zYg9lW0nRFxvG/NEDjH9bP YDahCs8sxWV+zptx7bft/lGwY2AneFoTv323K/8nmEJgWCpWT8G1dh9EILJNP4+2LS4O hsQyuzR4faEu77HPQX0bUBTK2wYZ55OFuV0CkqCUP+TFRLOR6osOfBGVZQGVMZZAMIPQ s+rDejXdGYrf3UhjC1ViTTMTCIZEGPlyETtvtPYOpq4cRr4+qWUa5KsRFD8VL3BvmZV+ ZHhNW+5Y/SFnmNI4ggGqB3KrCmxKSM75akUXjyHqWB8fbfqjwYxm2Ybad2XIoTY7UxAe Zg7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+IP1rv4P+uEvHts4xCdHZrVpyvp26bh66kuZedqiMMp4l211Q gq0BRI91x+fmthxz11TmavI= X-Received: by 2002:adf:a1d8:: with SMTP id v24mr18987172wrv.378.1617443433390; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 02:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from agape.jhs ([5.171.72.64]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g16sm19513787wrs.76.2021.04.03.02.50.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Apr 2021 02:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 11:50:30 +0200 From: Fabio Aiuto To: dan.carpenter@oracle.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, joe@perches.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/30] staging: rtl8723bs: tidy up some error handling in core/rtw_mlme.c Message-ID: <20210403095029.GD1563@agape.jhs> References: <20210403094247.GC1563@agape.jhs> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210403094247.GC1563@agape.jhs> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:42:47AM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote: > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:13:38AM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote: > > the RT_TRACE() output is not useful so we want to delete it. In this case > > there is no cleanup for rtw_cleanbss_cmd() required or even possible. I've > > deleted the RT_TRACE() output and added a goto unlock to show > > that we can't continue if rtw_createbss_cmd() fails. > > > > Suggested-by: David Carpenter > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto > > --- > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c | 17 +++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > Hi Dan, > > I put a Suggested-by tag on one patch in v3 patchset. But reading the docs > on submitting patches I relaized later that maybe it requires your permission before. > > It' written about Reviewed-by but not about Suggested-by, should I have asked you before, should I? > > I'm sorry if I should have. Found it, I'm really sorry A Suggested-by: tag indicates that the patch idea is suggested by the person named and ensures credit to the person for the idea. Please note that this tag should not be added without the reporter's permission, especially if the idea was not posted in a public forum. That said, if we diligently credit our idea reporters, they will, hopefully, be inspired to help us again in the future. I wonder if in the case of this patch was needed this tag.. > > thank you, > > fabio regards, fabio