Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964816AbWJKLST (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:18:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964846AbWJKLST (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:18:19 -0400 Received: from mailer.gwdg.de ([134.76.10.26]:40875 "EHLO mailer.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964816AbWJKLSS (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:18:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:16:56 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Al Viro cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] use %p for pointers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 847 Lines: 24 >diff --git a/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c b/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c >index ddc0681..b30372f 100644 >--- a/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c >+++ b/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c >@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static int __init ts102_uctrl_init(void) > } > > driver->regs->uctrl_intr = UCTRL_INTR_RXNE_REQ|UCTRL_INTR_RXNE_MSK; >- printk("uctrl: 0x%x (irq %d)\n", driver->regs, driver->irq); >+ printk("uctrl: 0x%p (irq %d)\n", driver->regs, driver->irq); So what's the difference, except that %p will evaluate to (nil) or (null) when the argument is 0 [this is the case with glibc]? That would print 0x(nil). -`J' -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/