Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp2749108pxf; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:06:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy/oQK2jTfRWI7rReHpH1rmRx66p0n+95pZQ9se6pj5zGjVDtgJK65NkuVeHL/ibSmtgppR X-Received: by 2002:a92:c989:: with SMTP id y9mr1359337iln.173.1617566815286; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 13:06:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617566815; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=J8I/4znH7PycSE6wlujGyoff7k+ZzdBf0Rip9mrpr4+IHBciKDL0UbOA+d9YII8vi1 /M8VZ9fnybZ61X8go+i7nGPfiA2IvOMwDi2Vqv+yhOXjGgm+QTLcUHhuvZ5iPHVgf03h grrmG+PFAerWpENutji6FvOyp7WR3n1R92eG4jxySNfwTk+BFSq/SyldUN+z9xEJ8TvV xkGyVCl/yq30BC+xe8ky1JbWQFHLwwcDaaXPWHta+t/bgOEobNP96eKtG8SzQhR1FfaA dojBUxaXFFUXk0931TcCDZmpxmvM0M2TckzGBFYCmJ6B0LfgEw2Uf/GLWEs0BDtgaBND 90ng== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=vK2ONWswjWuqMY4wp7Bc0epbP51m2rqXmIJq9jTsfts=; b=M4+grRA55pKLKFz7BgU1X/z5sKOX7Kyrrr++Bl8XFlaxpA0R/GER0FqVKa1G6OvHHg oIurGwB2rZpmmUIPJj90lQnnMpr/ucysnEMcyAaM3eZZZmqZ6xoUrOHTgr7NGqSRgBHA SpBdymAhOr8pWmhHSkCrBmCc5bzGRPriKQXci3K6gIXdo1bEDctoRPYLH3i1pcjVlqbs IkPXoyt/uDvPAffe1d1OUH33ztRLagdmBmA4VVbC5q+f72ANVjaV8x5z2tfGVbCWhkPh WQmOBWuw+WTGK5eVh9z/sjbiqMoqovTcgMNmkQVtQ7bHpeTvuIvNFfXETnlwdNXOzCkQ wGMQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XedzNXN7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v7si13792279jat.21.2021.04.04.13.06.42; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 13:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XedzNXN7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231527AbhDDUEi (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 4 Apr 2021 16:04:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57010 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231514AbhDDUE3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Apr 2021 16:04:29 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C666C06178C; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id x11so9814951qkp.11; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 13:04:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vK2ONWswjWuqMY4wp7Bc0epbP51m2rqXmIJq9jTsfts=; b=XedzNXN7vIDm7iz22XCZbr1D6okRjiNPdRn7IZj4IbxIbrr+K10VBE7Ahy3aWYRrH0 Rrr2k1hWP7ycRyCfs/bc/VMzeAdt9OkhR24KxYY65uxrz2R78YRSOFglyOz/roYkpo/H mMOjFOI13SgjBXSqVX30kMsJEFb9oZekszHOKL1e6W9yJNd9wAhvOW4hhUdSsjzM7Rux HmVdF5AME+LY56fYZDxQ9WtTXYWvH7LbP/wUJ7VI8gZddmhUBYeV6CNreMM1FXwNsGlk DG+r6wzPm3+urVKX/S3pB9FGlw9TPTDAtdyQXu/5bQDEsf09fQSL2y6IhvOp8s8FzfBf yG6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vK2ONWswjWuqMY4wp7Bc0epbP51m2rqXmIJq9jTsfts=; b=sTz5iExuKTvqh1k++M1JNizQE6Q5WZDpiSHUb49inX7CTaV64cD7nvkS3+wKcRCo2Z 11B1nhtltjTyh9pfi5wKS+qIacZiBSMvHgPQw0PPi0R4LkzWQHrE1x/HEuXujGlhm3t+ m9PDyD9qLjiuZJRHymPSFOeDWuZLKRk6RNXSFCjt+ZEo3NbQ/FMahqfVmO93NJ83kho9 uU71/N+l8qQKJeslLbY0pA9HJs98QwXysL0wLMUp2U2TwALQMQ2ci1QGOcq7OVBUaZJV oFth04x2aGF93s2srvMWyjmP2YAijlNPJ3DllgGgy8K/uCmf0WBTlLd3MPRuUPA1nRlL 3rzA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530VbUNt3lKNLd/EfKdNYT00B+/eBUmkIpXyD8XJgGw9Tqe6M4MI Wz2QL9BDUprKUiCnw7fyiL9At83Px8yyeM81 X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:20c8:: with SMTP id f8mr20726694qka.41.1617566662285; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 13:04:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([179.218.4.27]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d24sm12163480qkl.49.2021.04.04.13.04.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 04 Apr 2021 13:04:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Pedro Tammela X-Google-Original-From: Pedro Tammela To: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Shuah Khan , Pedro Tammela , David Verbeiren , Matthieu Baerts , netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:BPF (Safe dynamic programs and tools)), bpf@vger.kernel.org (open list:BPF (Safe dynamic programs and tools)), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list), linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org (open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK) Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: selftests: refactor 'BPF_PERCPU_TYPE()' and 'bpf_percpu()' macros Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2021 17:02:47 -0300 Message-Id: <20210404200256.300532-3-pctammela@mojatatu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210404200256.300532-1-pctammela@mojatatu.com> References: <20210404200256.300532-1-pctammela@mojatatu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This macro was refactored out of the bpf selftests. Since percpu values are rounded up to '8' in the kernel, a careless user in userspace might encounter unexpected values when parsing the output of the batched operations. Now that both array and hash maps have support for batched ops in the percpu variant, let's provide a convenient macro to declare percpu map value types. Updates the tests to a "reference" usage of the new macro. Signed-off-by: Pedro Tammela --- tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 10 ++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h | 7 --- .../bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c | 48 ++++++++++--------- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_init.c | 5 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 16 ++++--- 5 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h index 875dde20d56e..5feace6960e3 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h @@ -128,6 +128,16 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_delete_elem(int fd, const void *key); LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_get_next_key(int fd, const void *key, void *next_key); LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_freeze(int fd); +#define __bpf_percpu_align __attribute__((__aligned__(8))) + +#define BPF_PERCPU_TYPE(type) \ + struct { \ + type v; \ + /* padding */ \ + } __bpf_percpu_align + +#define bpf_percpu(name, cpu) ((name)[(cpu)].v) + struct bpf_map_batch_opts { size_t sz; /* size of this struct for forward/backward compatibility */ __u64 elem_flags; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h index a3352a64c067..105db3120ab4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h @@ -20,13 +20,6 @@ static inline unsigned int bpf_num_possible_cpus(void) return possible_cpus; } -#define __bpf_percpu_val_align __attribute__((__aligned__(8))) - -#define BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(type, name) \ - struct { type v; /* padding */ } __bpf_percpu_val_align \ - name[bpf_num_possible_cpus()] -#define bpf_percpu(name, cpu) name[(cpu)].v - #ifndef ARRAY_SIZE # define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0])) #endif diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c index 976bf415fbdd..3909e3980094 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c @@ -10,27 +10,31 @@ #include #include +typedef BPF_PERCPU_TYPE(int) pcpu_map_value_t; + static void map_batch_update(int map_fd, __u32 max_entries, int *keys, void *values, bool is_pcpu) { - typedef BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(int, value); - value *v = NULL; + unsigned int nr_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus(); + pcpu_map_value_t *v; int i, j, err; + int offset = 0; DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_batch_opts, opts, .elem_flags = 0, .flags = 0, ); if (is_pcpu) - v = (value *)values; + v = values; for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) { keys[i] = i + 1; if (is_pcpu) - for (j = 0; j < bpf_num_possible_cpus(); j++) - bpf_percpu(v[i], j) = i + 2 + j; + for (j = 0; j < nr_cpus; j++) + bpf_percpu(v + offset, j) = i + 2 + j; else ((int *)values)[i] = i + 2; + offset += nr_cpus; } err = bpf_map_update_batch(map_fd, keys, values, &max_entries, &opts); @@ -40,22 +44,23 @@ static void map_batch_update(int map_fd, __u32 max_entries, int *keys, static void map_batch_verify(int *visited, __u32 max_entries, int *keys, void *values, bool is_pcpu) { - typedef BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(int, value); - value *v = NULL; + unsigned int nr_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus(); + pcpu_map_value_t *v; int i, j; + int offset = 0; if (is_pcpu) - v = (value *)values; + v = values; memset(visited, 0, max_entries * sizeof(*visited)); for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) { - if (is_pcpu) { - for (j = 0; j < bpf_num_possible_cpus(); j++) { - CHECK(keys[i] + 1 + j != bpf_percpu(v[i], j), + for (j = 0; j < nr_cpus; j++) { + int value = bpf_percpu(v + offset, j); + CHECK(keys[i] + 1 + j != value, "key/value checking", - "error: i %d j %d key %d value %d\n", - i, j, keys[i], bpf_percpu(v[i], j)); + "error: i %d j %d key %d value %d\n", i, + j, keys[i], value); } } else { CHECK(keys[i] + 1 != ((int *)values)[i], @@ -63,9 +68,8 @@ static void map_batch_verify(int *visited, __u32 max_entries, "error: i %d key %d value %d\n", i, keys[i], ((int *)values)[i]); } - + offset += nr_cpus; visited[i] = 1; - } for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) { CHECK(visited[i] != 1, "visited checking", @@ -75,11 +79,10 @@ static void map_batch_verify(int *visited, __u32 max_entries, void __test_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(bool is_pcpu) { + unsigned int nr_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus(); __u32 batch, count, total, total_success; - typedef BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(int, value); int map_fd, *keys, *visited, key; const __u32 max_entries = 10; - value pcpu_values[max_entries]; int err, step, value_size; bool nospace_err; void *values; @@ -100,12 +103,13 @@ void __test_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(bool is_pcpu) CHECK(map_fd == -1, "bpf_create_map_xattr()", "error:%s\n", strerror(errno)); - value_size = is_pcpu ? sizeof(value) : sizeof(int); - keys = malloc(max_entries * sizeof(int)); if (is_pcpu) - values = pcpu_values; + value_size = sizeof(pcpu_map_value_t) * nr_cpus; else - values = malloc(max_entries * sizeof(int)); + value_size = sizeof(int); + + keys = malloc(max_entries * sizeof(int)); + values = calloc(max_entries, value_size); visited = malloc(max_entries * sizeof(int)); CHECK(!keys || !values || !visited, "malloc()", "error:%s\n", strerror(errno)); @@ -203,7 +207,7 @@ void __test_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(bool is_pcpu) CHECK(total != max_entries, "delete with steps", "total = %u, max_entries = %u\n", total, max_entries); - /* check map is empty, errono == ENOENT */ + /* check map is empty, errno == ENOENT */ err = bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, &key); CHECK(!err || errno != ENOENT, "bpf_map_get_next_key()", "error: %s\n", strerror(errno)); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_init.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_init.c index 14a31109dd0e..ec3d010319cc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_init.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_init.c @@ -12,10 +12,7 @@ static int duration; typedef unsigned long long map_key_t; typedef unsigned long long map_value_t; -typedef struct { - map_value_t v; /* padding */ -} __bpf_percpu_val_align pcpu_map_value_t; - +typedef BPF_PERCPU_TYPE(map_value_t) pcpu_map_value_t; static int map_populate(int map_fd, int num) { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c index 51adc42b2b40..6acbebef5f90 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ #define ENOTSUPP 524 #endif +typedef BPF_PERCPU_TYPE(long) pcpu_map_value_t; + static int skips; static int map_flags; @@ -147,13 +149,13 @@ static void test_hashmap_sizes(unsigned int task, void *data) static void test_hashmap_percpu(unsigned int task, void *data) { unsigned int nr_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus(); - BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(long, value); + pcpu_map_value_t value[nr_cpus]; long long key, next_key, first_key; int expected_key_mask = 0; int fd, i; - fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH, sizeof(key), - sizeof(bpf_percpu(value, 0)), 2, map_flags); + fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH, sizeof(key), sizeof(long), + 2, map_flags); if (fd < 0) { printf("Failed to create hashmap '%s'!\n", strerror(errno)); exit(1); @@ -400,11 +402,11 @@ static void test_arraymap(unsigned int task, void *data) static void test_arraymap_percpu(unsigned int task, void *data) { unsigned int nr_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus(); - BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(long, values); + pcpu_map_value_t values[nr_cpus]; int key, next_key, fd, i; fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY, sizeof(key), - sizeof(bpf_percpu(values, 0)), 2, 0); + sizeof(long), 2, 0); if (fd < 0) { printf("Failed to create arraymap '%s'!\n", strerror(errno)); exit(1); @@ -459,7 +461,7 @@ static void test_arraymap_percpu(unsigned int task, void *data) static void test_arraymap_percpu_many_keys(void) { unsigned int nr_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus(); - BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(long, values); + pcpu_map_value_t values[nr_cpus]; /* nr_keys is not too large otherwise the test stresses percpu * allocator more than anything else */ @@ -467,7 +469,7 @@ static void test_arraymap_percpu_many_keys(void) int key, fd, i; fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY, sizeof(key), - sizeof(bpf_percpu(values, 0)), nr_keys, 0); + sizeof(long), nr_keys, 0); if (fd < 0) { printf("Failed to create per-cpu arraymap '%s'!\n", strerror(errno)); -- 2.25.1