Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp3351389pxf; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 09:45:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmSz6Szi3/dXE/mUha8UKeTbp/WL+MQRIy0dMbjaFDmdiZEzKn0Dqxu95mZpatDzVv/w7t X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2cd1:: with SMTP id r17mr28926848ejr.429.1617641105560; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 09:45:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617641105; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rF3pOK7G9+OLPywKEg2woen4yKsdglqkNGNznoByQiY/KvMjGJrKWDfk8+HlMwJOzJ lK8RHXsfLpubuwzA+p7EvQ10aKGTCd4jqljZvUU1pAhNTEkCYKUaGKHbsThJj/SuQy5d IuIC03q2a3VbbkbnHpr6LJ3Qtp83t7tiwLxYtmut1QRu4uEA+jxQUMYum936cJO2pAM0 IoTrhCDnN/h1BchpIkjZqTFHRDXtnnU5dADOWR7r9hT2EMj3Nu52NNGl0GQZoR5Bs2A4 Upo7+gfWCKpdJ8RSkYNOeZkJoWLaTIv7ztI1V2/4ulYmPhhsesntV8j228ldu+qJZPMo OLXQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=9tQxxzJAjdIl/pQwnkWxAgw6TowA5D9hThonPyIyzog=; b=kAmH9MJ9xbaAGvAtw8aMdT9I1fAmBPZmVDwuNTTYD9ERTOca+6TUSLWEs/f99ecj1S R+R+eP24p9j4UgD1R/vzL4gOhYu8AsUtECj0n2cvTLO0E/s80GfHR3hbc/SNhhg05B7w dci7agR8b0OB8TERydRgJ4GceV764NoTngU63QEnD6sROAvi/WZq6ML0it5T9m+b5+eB 3s7IeISHgOY0qBP3gD4hiDtnoaUEN1t071GCPbYTFyL06ShwkCbpzqEuBEQ7BR+Q02o1 SGuTwGuMQuz6p6PuTXk+hrs0izUdu+1Xp2tJOwueLGwAJecl4k1xEhd0erB6tJbEQ9Nf JwKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=UOE3JM7v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i10si13409543edy.452.2021.04.05.09.44.42; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 09:45:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=UOE3JM7v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240726AbhDEJQb (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Apr 2021 05:16:31 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60342 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239308AbhDEJNF (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2021 05:13:05 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17E9061002; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 09:12:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1617613978; bh=1GOnMOlLeJLuqLMNX4aSagmBsEVaUzYWZuK/D6aoQTc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UOE3JM7vpqdVHcNd65xnuvgmOD5+voH02gQNHWX1BTjn0MeYMQ3Jtue0zdHVbGnhT B0K4BThHn7dIoTzbRxPASv+zmoagvESwL8XteO50jD8dwO+Bde8iQsDFSvQV8vofrS Tk5/PCjCm/kUD7Ukw5OWh7qHDU+nf1EUbndtrUk4= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Metzmacher , Jens Axboe , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.11 039/152] io_uring: call req_set_fail_links() on short send[msg]()/recv[msg]() with MSG_WAITALL Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 10:53:08 +0200 Message-Id: <20210405085035.545987518@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210405085034.233917714@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210405085034.233917714@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Stefan Metzmacher [ Upstream commit 0031275d119efe16711cd93519b595e6f9b4b330 ] Without that it's not safe to use them in a linked combination with others. Now combinations like IORING_OP_SENDMSG followed by IORING_OP_SPLICE should be possible. We already handle short reads and writes for the following opcodes: - IORING_OP_READV - IORING_OP_READ_FIXED - IORING_OP_READ - IORING_OP_WRITEV - IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED - IORING_OP_WRITE - IORING_OP_SPLICE - IORING_OP_TEE Now we have it for these as well: - IORING_OP_SENDMSG - IORING_OP_SEND - IORING_OP_RECVMSG - IORING_OP_RECV For IORING_OP_RECVMSG we also check for the MSG_TRUNC and MSG_CTRUNC flags in order to call req_set_fail_links(). There might be applications arround depending on the behavior that even short send[msg]()/recv[msg]() retuns continue an IOSQE_IO_LINK chain. It's very unlikely that such applications pass in MSG_WAITALL, which is only defined in 'man 2 recvmsg', but not in 'man 2 sendmsg'. It's expected that the low level sock_sendmsg() call just ignores MSG_WAITALL, as MSG_ZEROCOPY is also ignored without explicitly set SO_ZEROCOPY. We also expect the caller to know about the implicit truncation to MAX_RW_COUNT, which we don't detect. cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c4e1a4cc0d905314f4d5dc567e65a7b09621aab3.1615908477.git.metze@samba.org Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/io_uring.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c index 26b4af9831da..2b0b9c3dda33 100644 --- a/fs/io_uring.c +++ b/fs/io_uring.c @@ -4628,6 +4628,7 @@ static int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, struct io_async_msghdr iomsg, *kmsg; struct socket *sock; unsigned flags; + int min_ret = 0; int ret; sock = sock_from_file(req->file); @@ -4654,6 +4655,9 @@ static int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, else if (force_nonblock) flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT; + if (flags & MSG_WAITALL) + min_ret = iov_iter_count(&kmsg->msg.msg_iter); + ret = __sys_sendmsg_sock(sock, &kmsg->msg, flags); if (force_nonblock && ret == -EAGAIN) return io_setup_async_msg(req, kmsg); @@ -4663,7 +4667,7 @@ static int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, if (kmsg->iov != kmsg->fast_iov) kfree(kmsg->iov); req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP; - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < min_ret) req_set_fail_links(req); __io_req_complete(req, ret, 0, cs); return 0; @@ -4677,6 +4681,7 @@ static int io_send(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, struct iovec iov; struct socket *sock; unsigned flags; + int min_ret = 0; int ret; sock = sock_from_file(req->file); @@ -4698,6 +4703,9 @@ static int io_send(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, else if (force_nonblock) flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT; + if (flags & MSG_WAITALL) + min_ret = iov_iter_count(&msg.msg_iter); + msg.msg_flags = flags; ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg); if (force_nonblock && ret == -EAGAIN) @@ -4705,7 +4713,7 @@ static int io_send(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS) ret = -EINTR; - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < min_ret) req_set_fail_links(req); __io_req_complete(req, ret, 0, cs); return 0; @@ -4857,6 +4865,7 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, struct socket *sock; struct io_buffer *kbuf; unsigned flags; + int min_ret = 0; int ret, cflags = 0; sock = sock_from_file(req->file); @@ -4892,6 +4901,9 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, else if (force_nonblock) flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT; + if (flags & MSG_WAITALL) + min_ret = iov_iter_count(&kmsg->msg.msg_iter); + ret = __sys_recvmsg_sock(sock, &kmsg->msg, req->sr_msg.umsg, kmsg->uaddr, flags); if (force_nonblock && ret == -EAGAIN) @@ -4904,7 +4916,7 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, if (kmsg->iov != kmsg->fast_iov) kfree(kmsg->iov); req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP; - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < min_ret || ((flags & MSG_WAITALL) && (kmsg->msg.msg_flags & (MSG_TRUNC | MSG_CTRUNC)))) req_set_fail_links(req); __io_req_complete(req, ret, cflags, cs); return 0; @@ -4920,6 +4932,7 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, struct socket *sock; struct iovec iov; unsigned flags; + int min_ret = 0; int ret, cflags = 0; sock = sock_from_file(req->file); @@ -4950,6 +4963,9 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, else if (force_nonblock) flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT; + if (flags & MSG_WAITALL) + min_ret = iov_iter_count(&msg.msg_iter); + ret = sock_recvmsg(sock, &msg, flags); if (force_nonblock && ret == -EAGAIN) return -EAGAIN; @@ -4958,7 +4974,7 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, out_free: if (req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED) cflags = io_put_recv_kbuf(req); - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < min_ret || ((flags & MSG_WAITALL) && (msg.msg_flags & (MSG_TRUNC | MSG_CTRUNC)))) req_set_fail_links(req); __io_req_complete(req, ret, cflags, cs); return 0; -- 2.30.1