Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp3772132pxf; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 23:03:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJygJZJQIiaqaOlYnZRmA/CznNN7Nt+7sHlaZGvsnCnpgFG9iTLRrHFDBIUUeBHY0h0u8qW9 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1aab:: with SMTP id l11mr3927964ilv.150.1617688997718; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 23:03:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617688997; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SB/fQkKU7aykYpmypkC1Dnd7P8MhfckMxJGbYuic8BnrlFD1+nrqAJ2flmVkupXJYG vaNGTBkw8AIqkCXHJDKsOgo8oQCDnr7r+8YRnlGX/6d2oSwea5x3nfNSGApZ4c66J/IN fNxf9LN01pzelH8/MeJl843B+zcFnniFknInkxEYn2VjGu06pb5TYLA29yfNR/KvPceU jGE3IWL10BNCkwWyk31r2PsEQ7kvavW+IjjUYTpyJli2fIF9xfoR0pdER9idHqJBP7cE e4Nr35jnRPHZ8IvjB/Tf8yxd8yzITLfVcDV7gnltNQMx/58RtC4PshjXMIms0umFHX7J h6nQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=rfXsRgtZN0UOZyqgmbG4UgSdv5qoMCghq6jhX8YDMa4=; b=JYT24GAY96hl5p3R3hf9duXFEr25fvmTvMgvh1sqVe90DEk1kVUHy63vy+ObGeVWVU jb8UKLprTwTUKRtcVqQnRG1cOLgRarh3IC+NCrUlSS9US/7N+3ZSyC/ZkjgE0lPXogiP B8ZThj6g0xBl9I5w2bJryttCNKR3zIJjAejF/2udl8X2reucuLExTzmVgss6ns2JRsuJ FgGc/UHfsmLe3Yo7NaoT2Gyu7jSvtqhr9mJfpk/YYoDsGJJ1qoWvi3bBMrE6qA9w7s0C WsfN7f2OfPuaCskB2tmMjIJyKMt7gzt7i1jF2AYdjuy1y73kAC+tzzTCyrj94xD6wYn3 gIfQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l2si1361557ilk.118.2021.04.05.23.03.05; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 23:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233147AbhDEQ7J (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Apr 2021 12:59:09 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:42570 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232546AbhDEQ7C (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2021 12:59:02 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lTSYx-00GsfU-Nz; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 10:58:55 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=fess.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lTSYw-000Z25-OY; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 10:58:55 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Alexey Gladkov Cc: LKML , Kernel Hardening , Linux Containers , linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexey Gladkov , Andrew Morton , Christian Brauner , Jann Horn , Jens Axboe , Kees Cook , Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov References: <9c8b24db40a030347652ee58f44028ca1081acfa.1616533074.git.gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 11:58:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <9c8b24db40a030347652ee58f44028ca1081acfa.1616533074.git.gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> (Alexey Gladkov's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:59:15 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1lTSYw-000Z25-OY;;;mid=;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/lRCz+abrVYSdzhXtMBllzyd5yG1jeH8w= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa02.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,XMSubLong, XM_B_SpammyWords autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.2 XM_B_SpammyWords One or more commonly used spammy words * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Alexey Gladkov X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 452 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 4.1 (0.9%), b_tie_ro: 2.8 (0.6%), parse: 1.17 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 4.0 (0.9%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.77 (0.4%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.3 (0.7%), tests_pri_-950: 1.10 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 0.89 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 167 (37.0%), check_bayes: 166 (36.7%), b_tokenize: 6 (1.3%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.2%), b_comp_prob: 1.53 (0.3%), b_tok_touch_all: 150 (33.1%), b_finish: 0.82 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 252 (55.7%), check_dkim_signature: 0.40 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.5 (0.5%), poll_dns_idle: 1.10 (0.2%), tests_pri_10: 2.9 (0.6%), tests_pri_500: 8 (1.8%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/8] Reimplement RLIMIT_SIGPENDING on top of ucounts X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org A small bug below. Eric > diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c > index f2a1b898da29..1b537d9de447 100644 > --- a/kernel/signal.c > +++ b/kernel/signal.c > @@ -413,49 +413,44 @@ void task_join_group_stop(struct task_struct *task) > static struct sigqueue * > __sigqueue_alloc(int sig, struct task_struct *t, gfp_t flags, int override_rlimit) > { > - struct sigqueue *q = NULL; > - struct user_struct *user; > - int sigpending; > + struct sigqueue *q = kmem_cache_alloc(sigqueue_cachep, flags); > > - /* > - * Protect access to @t credentials. This can go away when all > - * callers hold rcu read lock. > - * > - * NOTE! A pending signal will hold on to the user refcount, > - * and we get/put the refcount only when the sigpending count > - * changes from/to zero. > - */ > - rcu_read_lock(); > - user = __task_cred(t)->user; > - sigpending = atomic_inc_return(&user->sigpending); > - if (sigpending == 1) > - get_uid(user); > - rcu_read_unlock(); > + if (likely(q != NULL)) { > + bool overlimit; > > - if (override_rlimit || likely(sigpending <= task_rlimit(t, RLIMIT_SIGPENDING))) { > - q = kmem_cache_alloc(sigqueue_cachep, flags); > - } else { > - print_dropped_signal(sig); > - } > - > - if (unlikely(q == NULL)) { > - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&user->sigpending)) > - free_uid(user); > - } else { > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->list); > q->flags = 0; > - q->user = user; > + > + /* > + * Protect access to @t credentials. This can go away when all > + * callers hold rcu read lock. > + */ > + rcu_read_lock(); > + q->ucounts = get_ucounts(task_ucounts(t)); > + if (q->ucounts) { > + overlimit = inc_rlimit_ucounts_and_test(q->ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_SIGPENDING, > + 1, task_rlimit(t, RLIMIT_SIGPENDING)); > + > + if (override_rlimit || likely(!overlimit)) { > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + return q; > + } > + } > + rcu_read_unlock(); I believe you need to call __sigqueue_free here. > } > > - return q; > + print_dropped_signal(sig); > + return NULL; > } > > static void __sigqueue_free(struct sigqueue *q) > { > if (q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC) > return; > - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&q->user->sigpending)) > - free_uid(q->user); > + if (q->ucounts) { > + dec_rlimit_ucounts(q->ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_SIGPENDING, 1); > + put_ucounts(q->ucounts); > + } > kmem_cache_free(sigqueue_cachep, q); > } > Eric