Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161146AbWJKRXg (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:23:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161149AbWJKRXf (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:23:35 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:2997 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161146AbWJKRXf (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:23:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:23:31 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] Introduce round_jiffies() to save spurious wakeups Message-ID: <20061011172331.GA13099@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu References: <1160496165.3000.308.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1160496165.3000.308.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1542 Lines: 32 On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 06:02:45PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > Hi, > > the following 2 patches will introduce the round_jiffies() api and users > thereof. > > The general idea is that by rounding the jiffies for certain timers to > the next whole second will make those timers all happen at the same > time; and thus reduce the number of times the cpu has to wake up to > service timers (this assumes a tickless kernel) > > Obviously only timers where the exact time of firing isn't so important > can do this; several of the recurring "always live" timers of the kernel > are of this kind, they want "about once a second" or "about once every 4 > seconds" and such, and don't really care about the exact jiffy in which > they fire. > > An alternative would have been to introduce mod_timer_rounded() or > somesuch APIs (but there's many variants that take jiffies); I feel that > an explicit caller based rounding actually is quite reasonable. I think the API you proposed is horrible. Having jiffies exposed in ani API is a mistake, and adding more makes this problem worse. I'd suggest to start with Alan's patches that add a timer variant that takes a miliseconds argument instead of jiffies and add a _rounded varaint to it that has a new parameter that specifies the precision. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/