Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp3853857pxf; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 01:46:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwWMBcXB5Sm8OlIe2m8X+/wIxuqi5UbsCXj+fF5EOJG7hmGDPRXt/ZQDW+1fGzDWyesc4UH X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ff15:: with SMTP id zn21mr18602216ejb.296.1617698760441; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 01:46:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617698760; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FQ4pniJ6vRuwE9IPwQD3VEeqGFFh+DFQP2qQS15ll1kgTSxkr0yb9H7s3/PHn32g/N 14ygS/PIRt1WHOuHTkwr7VU0KZPWD22E+BaBgewVgYKrkRnV8RXDqA1ap1qq1qVAOf8V Y078si16H6LbriqmKro/0lBVFW6joUx3hJIkDj1nazKnFTsabwf4GEWnsXCA84fdngSQ QLDYFg60X0vAsjEAZ8gwSrDC4LuS/oplCU4Vy6odQcxF9yy1oSOEHOA2NGLvXzPN6c2C 1A1ebusPEPkErnf5X9FbXCztKyn6JU3HbI/7jI+wwrpOC94eoWk6qCSE3c0B8v+Z+k0M wcdg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=PcM2nLWWb5ibyqpAuP83fUbFqchIJ5grHuXYWNO+I20=; b=yrprsNXyiNANQbbX6kJQmp19nU5ZpwMvzCl/wralfpnTEH7VETaDANgUVuo/OJB1Mm 83a8aC7It6P/hA29qaW8e43zUXLpp6jz4d/aJlQeju+TRK0eMfUyI5SyGSU9fj7MrjL1 p30ZTsKTVxJO0S+nqTOiBZKV4FmzKNUu7aGhp7bOrhq5K8RfK+CP9hkrt5DoTtSNFisH 37eUlSlObWZC668WWVJP2Sgy1sltGuhHTp8sB4FjJwz0FUVcFW/qN0F5T4+ce6iPkfjK swWHib+XNkW3EXOz30EQB5wM4QHiv26JW4ZXWSuLnyuYtbiQbXu2uCo8adhrYcppSuuv jCpQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f1si15187755ejh.95.2021.04.06.01.45.32; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 01:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235157AbhDES3P (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:29:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36566 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235155AbhDES3K (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:29:10 -0400 Received: from zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk (zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2607:5300:60:148a::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91107C061756; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 11:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viro by zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lTTy2-002o1H-4D; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 18:28:54 +0000 Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 18:28:54 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Christian Brauner Cc: Jens Axboe , syzbot , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, io-uring@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in mntput_no_expire (2) Message-ID: References: <20210404164040.vtxdcfzgliuzghwk@wittgenstein> <20210404170513.mfl5liccdaxjnpls@wittgenstein> <20210405114437.hjcojekyp5zt6huu@wittgenstein> <20210405170801.zrdhnon6g4ggb6c7@wittgenstein> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 06:23:49PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 07:08:01PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > Ah dentry count of -127 looks... odd. > > dead + 1... > > void lockref_mark_dead(struct lockref *lockref) > { > assert_spin_locked(&lockref->lock); > lockref->count = -128; > } > > IOW, a leaked (uncounted) reference to dentry, that got dget() called on > it after dentry had been freed. > > IOW, current->fs->pwd.dentry happens to point to an already freed > struct dentry here. Joy... > > Could you slap > > spin_lock(¤t->fs->lock); > WARN_ON(d_count(current->fs->pwd.dentry) < 0); > spin_unlock(¤t->fs->lock); > > before and after calls of io_issue_sqe() and see if it triggers? We definitely > are seeing buggered dentry refcounting here. Check if this helps, please. diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c index 216f16e74351..82344f1139ff 100644 --- a/fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/namei.c @@ -2289,6 +2289,9 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags) int error; const char *s = nd->name->name; + nd->path.mnt = NULL; + nd->path.dentry = NULL; + /* LOOKUP_CACHED requires RCU, ask caller to retry */ if ((flags & (LOOKUP_RCU | LOOKUP_CACHED)) == LOOKUP_CACHED) return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN); @@ -2322,8 +2325,6 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags) } nd->root.mnt = NULL; - nd->path.mnt = NULL; - nd->path.dentry = NULL; /* Absolute pathname -- fetch the root (LOOKUP_IN_ROOT uses nd->dfd). */ if (*s == '/' && !(flags & LOOKUP_IN_ROOT)) {