Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp3860326pxf; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 01:59:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNesf+MEA1yW0li27ZYHLtCJ5iDsB1tU+JZmSwDi08t5TB1nx1htWGdTa9IydQ4oXXWjUt X-Received: by 2002:a02:3b10:: with SMTP id c16mr28462496jaa.48.1617699565153; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 01:59:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617699565; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=t1kRIDkvdCop7xsI06thNeE9dpFByiTg5uZBHmZXP3CMn8tj+/ljx8SLFvSLJFxw1j lih2DQI5p2piUvjr0SuFsneyEblXf61MmARFZSOvPl313ndCtyuihQrAmMfFShZVNwhm F/+DNz3KJUDpoWttY6mWutZ6iGwguOKJyVVSoAcoa64xNI7gsPnbCvIEu2h9490ehRw4 4XWBCBq7gpDEKKLJktZaAFr5WJZKAsDS5/VWkSgX50zi5DDi3eZekIF9J0EtIsi+L+1Y fyQ4RbhTE2k/XaJKz7DQmpCL3Y9ZjCHzP1zHn5hZ8aF3HbKN1cE9Ht42cZHGIvwZLjkr 3wqw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=ejkLT7MxbzGQldEQtME9Nxk3EQnJ9M/PoqtMt8tMSRk=; b=BwLCJUEmRKxSJ86OxhJhGF3j+7fQlxm/CvkXKgEhuc0WpwTEhx53WVNErFt+9CtTX1 jrbR/2BMVJ+8D+mBXEQ4icB5jOUCtJ7FFKOKK6jOIKJuKR7Ol80SFrfiE0i66qUAW+OL jXwuBYIJDUm8wQQ0nPwfiG02RDi+C6ZSclQtgOWNFiAZRwHqQXxH7e+XdVgFHKUywSrd tZtnbEvHdlUhYB2SRxM5TuWkjaVPWLFjnOQB5WVSfRSizJHaO5/l8zuL5DcrijJdfjSR XQ169HEuxfulJxBtdlOXAJ1ubXsaz/QpU9QPjVIoI2HC58rFWmhdyWGl9nzHzNrydr4y mTgQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n5si16672454iob.85.2021.04.06.01.59.12; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 01:59:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240514AbhDEUHz (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:07:55 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45204 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239120AbhDEUHt (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:07:49 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85237613C2; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 22:07:37 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Al Viro Cc: Jens Axboe , syzbot , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, io-uring@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in mntput_no_expire (2) Message-ID: <20210405200737.qurhkqitoxweousx@wittgenstein> References: <20210404164040.vtxdcfzgliuzghwk@wittgenstein> <20210404170513.mfl5liccdaxjnpls@wittgenstein> <20210405114437.hjcojekyp5zt6huu@wittgenstein> <20210405170801.zrdhnon6g4ggb6c7@wittgenstein> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 06:28:54PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 06:23:49PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 07:08:01PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > > > Ah dentry count of -127 looks... odd. > > > > dead + 1... > > > > void lockref_mark_dead(struct lockref *lockref) > > { > > assert_spin_locked(&lockref->lock); > > lockref->count = -128; > > } > > > > IOW, a leaked (uncounted) reference to dentry, that got dget() called on > > it after dentry had been freed. > > > > IOW, current->fs->pwd.dentry happens to point to an already freed > > struct dentry here. Joy... > > > > Could you slap > > > > spin_lock(¤t->fs->lock); > > WARN_ON(d_count(current->fs->pwd.dentry) < 0); > > spin_unlock(¤t->fs->lock); > > > > before and after calls of io_issue_sqe() and see if it triggers? We definitely > > are seeing buggered dentry refcounting here. > > Check if this helps, please. > > diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c > index 216f16e74351..82344f1139ff 100644 > --- a/fs/namei.c > +++ b/fs/namei.c > @@ -2289,6 +2289,9 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags) > int error; > const char *s = nd->name->name; > > + nd->path.mnt = NULL; > + nd->path.dentry = NULL; > + > /* LOOKUP_CACHED requires RCU, ask caller to retry */ > if ((flags & (LOOKUP_RCU | LOOKUP_CACHED)) == LOOKUP_CACHED) > return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN); > @@ -2322,8 +2325,6 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags) > } > > nd->root.mnt = NULL; > - nd->path.mnt = NULL; > - nd->path.dentry = NULL; > > /* Absolute pathname -- fetch the root (LOOKUP_IN_ROOT uses nd->dfd). */ > if (*s == '/' && !(flags & LOOKUP_IN_ROOT)) { Bingo. That fixes it.