Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:47:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:47:25 -0500 Received: from rj.sgi.com ([204.94.215.100]:24284 "EHLO rj.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:47:16 -0500 Message-Id: <200111081647.KAA23811@slobber.americas.sgi.com> To: Luka Renko cc: Nathan Scott , Linus Torvalds , Andreas Gruenbacher , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, acl-devel@bestbits.at, linux-xfs@hermes.si Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] extended attributes Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 10:47:05 -0600 From: Dean Roehrich Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >From: Luka Renko >I am also thinking in terms of HSM application (or DMAPI if you want). Where >do you want HSM attributes to be placed? I thought it should be in trusted, >because we might need access to them from user space. Other option is system >(that would require accessing them from kernel code) or user (might be >problematic, since regular user with write permission might remove them... >Actually, where are XFS guys storing DMAPI attributes today? On XFS the DMAPI event mask for that file is kept in a field in the xfs_dinode_core_t structure--so it's in the inode. On Irix, HSM's store state info in an extended attribute in the "root" namespace on each file, but they do it via the appropriate DMAPI calls (which jump to XFS's extended attribute code) rather than via the extended attribute library. Dean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/