Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: MIPS: rework flush_shadow_* callbacks into one
 that prepares the flush
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc:     Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
        seanjc@google.com, "open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20210402155807.49976-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
 <20210402155807.49976-3-pbonzini@redhat.com>
 <CAAhV-H4wskLvGD1hhuS2ZDOBNenCcTd_K8GkYn1GOzwnEvTDXQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <aab8a915-6e73-3cba-5392-8f940479a011@redhat.com>
 <CAAhV-H72z9DbbV=_fEhCeeOaP8fQ_qtr4rQMD=f5n08ekG=Ygw@mail.gmail.com>
 <510e59e7-91b0-6754-8fb5-6a936ef47b3c@redhat.com>
 <20210406113957.GB8277@alpha.franken.de>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <c0b70a90-3388-858d-2da7-4d7b62fda6db@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Apr 2021 13:55:06 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210406113957.GB8277@alpha.franken.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 06/04/21 13:39, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:05:40AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 06/04/21 03:36, Huacai Chen wrote:
>>>> I tried the merge and it will be enough for Linus to remove
>>>> arch/mips/kvm/trap_emul.c.  So I will leave it as is, but next time I'd
>>>> prefer KVM MIPS changes to go through either my tree or a common topic
>>>> branch.
>>> Emmm, the TE removal series is done by Thomas, not me.:)
>>
>> Sure, sorry if the sentence sounded like it was directed to you.  No matter
>> who wrote the code, synchronization between trees is only the maintainers'
>> task. :)
> 
> Sorry about the mess. I'll leave arch/mips/kvm to go via your tree then.

No problem.  In this specific case, at some point I'll pull from 
mips-next, prior to sending the pull request to Linus.  It will look 
just like other KVM submaintainer pulls.

Paolo