Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp303268pxf; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 23:08:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+ZARtsBIaN9Y34N3tJHKklwRthd9oloco421jjjZVDfqseIyg5YXSyWQB1PLTCwJ6FhpT X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:32d1:: with SMTP id k17mr1869380ejk.94.1617775715135; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 23:08:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617775715; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=csfZI+YS/onXuCnSw5ya9CaFYFFTrZHJmkaEX1Fj9TeNM7xaTPQckC7k44dRHtyUo6 sHy944iMNuEEdBQ2x77A4gxKxwLUznrd4uckopTLK2/Vv0qCfI1eWGKP0lNozPrjzLYA qAGrj2/4N1UOEfJUhmZlldKgmNK5YfmQtjTG4WrXhWMmtA1zDKky3QuYE7C8Va8vJear 1jmiqzqGKFIWPs/furYExs50hI6Oh1f5ElpaGJephKh9klhWtVqgD1FhlJ50BI7gmnfV bZFh9GFdlwehH71XZRGrrKGUMscOae3V0U/Uzvswphunf6ckSVMup6CpcFiBHWhOGzCl YPMw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=z4dXCA52eL9yGYEpPl96DmhaClVisBUZpt2xtmJBb8M=; b=uOpJH2fMxNUOsB3va8N7iXHcGwTegZHH4Ko8g9WWzS3hZuGV8QZOuKMN+IBhjm/lt8 FpSDV/GRJ/zllhj+JxxSVASlUdGWVv61bhRduyGiFh7xWYX3k6NzRzS/JeEPDD5jBTJW mXf1eyB4j02KBIMDs8MIo+caGwoFTIiJczrlpZKhjsMO388ISNw5Mr7cZC7ktxpLOcsj d0jYqTvYhWlJkKHi5dRf4icyCNHyRMlQvUqExd98RR0weUt1jkV+cYs3A9H25so/AQh0 0KCB9b2GbBHZRFZnd5OSv/eDIuJcECkUl8jv26CUlm9HIs4ukrJD1gmMzFoX5P70hLxi pGuw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=X77QCn7n; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a20si20467873ejg.304.2021.04.06.23.08.12; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 23:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=X77QCn7n; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244556AbhDFOVm (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:21:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41770 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237043AbhDFOVm (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:21:42 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B60DC061756 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 07:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id o10so23048595lfb.9 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 07:21:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=z4dXCA52eL9yGYEpPl96DmhaClVisBUZpt2xtmJBb8M=; b=X77QCn7n498c3YiPPqKnvfoDK1ALPoIzwOTOdapWUWwuKzdsQ3xWo/OznfYtfC3dGj rb0TAx5ZQC0MHX4OKg93zU6SjTAMKpJ9IcYP3bKj13S8/eM2pzb4yWt4axt8JMso//Cv DtdbXbOFBKwVnfgjZVMu68klEoBuAPo3x6w0B8KQjNFgtEMSmUeIz//i7CwJB9nK2jBL CdTnOlED4hyt46OO+HDicforXu3Edsso60+o5DqQz2N+4lg33wQRM3d5d3Lib5pxsAVq e4jIuZVi2GXr4sX+l5N9xLdgqRGdIz4WleLpCls93DJZgbgGbuB9IcRkc+/LYLC0cWY8 8v0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=z4dXCA52eL9yGYEpPl96DmhaClVisBUZpt2xtmJBb8M=; b=V0uP7ewozf1pNs1VdTjw5Smvydt9ZGHzV2aSNXV3/0OtHWykYAXmpah635OxCxb1n7 k0mEsUALPz0RwrpKl5Ke5gPTpqbOlrLnGRRZMD02lgWNXU7aVIU6LjT862EF9wMDLUgW 1MaocGlRwqF4pNWI5WEoz1Ww7F4fJduGuGWjvhueOnmvCUUY7OUdt9IWaSL6YVGsC8OR wLrRFvplHSXZCPOYbNL/OYwh1mrm5zByQo1gBoW8XKuZIGRI/1k7KepzLqkYHxaCwGoj aM4MWXgOZqbJNFyni4T5goJdTU4REyIlY8TDwNkW9lGEqGb5Afwil4wlDCDuxnDztJ9K fHlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530g0f4uTx/0KgMjcpxI8S8VZgGbI5KHKPz463b9rWF9ibBrx9f7 vt2EoausbagRgT47Exxkn0ZqKw== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4111:: with SMTP id b17mr20833051lfi.96.1617718892692; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 07:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from box.localdomain ([86.57.175.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f8sm2174697lfs.143.2021.04.06.07.21.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Apr 2021 07:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by box.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F2E47101FF7; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 17:21:34 +0300 (+03) Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 17:21:34 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/27] mm: Introduce struct folio Message-ID: <20210406142134.tkxyy7ytib7vubf4@box.shutemov.name> References: <20210331184728.1188084-1-willy@infradead.org> <20210331184728.1188084-2-willy@infradead.org> <20210406122918.h5dsnbjhmwpfasf4@box.shutemov.name> <20210406124807.GO2531743@casper.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210406124807.GO2531743@casper.infradead.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 01:48:07PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Now, maybe we should put this optimisation into the definition of nth_page? Sounds like a good idea to me. > > > +struct folio { > > > + /* private: don't document the anon union */ > > > + union { > > > + struct { > > > + /* public: */ > > > + unsigned long flags; > > > + struct list_head lru; > > > + struct address_space *mapping; > > > + pgoff_t index; > > > + unsigned long private; > > > + atomic_t _mapcount; > > > + atomic_t _refcount; > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG > > > + unsigned long memcg_data; > > > +#endif > > > > As Christoph, I'm not a fan of this :/ > > What would you prefer? I liked earlier approach with only struct page here. Once we know a field should never be referenced from raw struct page, we can move it here. But feel free to ignore my suggestion. It's not show-stopper for me and reverting is back doesn't worth it. I went through the patchset and it looks good. You can use my Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov on all of them. Thanks a lot for doing this. -- Kirill A. Shutemov