Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 6 Apr 2021 19:21:15 +0200
From:   Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@samsung.com>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
CC:     <daejun7.park@samsung.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "avri.altman@wdc.com" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
        "jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        "asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
        "stanley.chu@mediatek.com" <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
        "cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
        "bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        JinHwan Park <jh.i.park@samsung.com>,
        Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@samsung.com>,
        Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@samsung.com>,
        Dukhyun Kwon <d_hyun.kwon@samsung.com>,
        "Keoseong Park" <keosung.park@samsung.com>,
        Jaemyung Lee <jaemyung.lee@samsung.com>,
        Jieon Seol <jieon.seol@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v32 0/4] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support
Message-ID: <20210406172115.hi7r47la232ou6yg@mpHalley.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a57cc487bcd1ccea0bc328d394d3ebdafb67a2f5.camel@gmail.com>
CMS-TYPE: 201P
References: <CGME20210331011526epcms2p37684869a9781d1eb45bfcbfe9babd217@epcms2p3>
        <20210331011526epcms2p37684869a9781d1eb45bfcbfe9babd217@epcms2p3>
        <a57cc487bcd1ccea0bc328d394d3ebdafb67a2f5.camel@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 31.03.2021 21:40, Bean Huo wrote:
>Hi Martin
>
>I don't know when/how do you plan to accept this patch. I think the
>Mobile vendors and chipset vendors are all looking forward to this UFS
>HPB feature that can be mainlined in the upstream Linux. Since the
>first version HPB driver submitted in the community, it is now V32, and
>we have been working on this feature for two years. Would you please
>take a look at this? thanks.

Hi Bean,

I believe it would help if you and others are willing to review this
patchset thoroughly and give a reviewed-by / tested-by tag. This will
give Martin and others more confidence that there is vendor alignment
and that there is a group of people is willing to maintain HPB going
forward.

What do you think?

Javier