Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp427739pxf; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 03:05:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQfiLMI53ojwhUoATmorm2pt3TXrIWfkWsXIwfT1cxr2v7bbSK4TjWi6c9Zezo1XTVfrgJ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d1cd:: with SMTP id g13mr3385479edp.369.1617789902653; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 03:05:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617789902; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kWpesqkJIX5P71piptqSjsqdehA5RNVAhB3NITVyfAZJWHCWl85FK32WYlOhTBM8Lv Sfmq1sZaI/hPfckLTFIcYTVCdz2geSlpa47+AICpD922uoitWH3IortgGv7mMqLzCnGv 4v4hZ704rptbdcgwjq6ASP7YuxDmQ7/Bm3gW9U00enJrRcuxMClXxfpxa1lxTm2qO+3h hY4zbHX3WprkijoJBJoF6QqLbfesIO+YFC9BTuQxGCnCMi9ABTigoJM1LAo9+5P9BIKw AeS3JnZwQ/owbBops7sEytHtusMKkYGZ2wLXoOg2PrLYm3OVH/C0TO1S+vPPDnjQgoCM oWDw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=8OABwLBp61V6Ja1BOaDpsU3oRaDqVsPNzSFxGffIGo4=; b=Iz7RMC+9fLVNuNA2zos/HkUIIAtGHDqrIZxn2Cur+ta/HaULUE27QNECjoDocza+DE waKTMWKPSD/906+QlSbJbQMwT5j967hL5H4pIri0w1aUQw+d6onY4r46LlaJtZ+FG2HP F8cweXjmC1/ILrEWzSn4xLyBi7VzyYwb2LzpTQ0Bi/duhWC+ltH+FuRja3qrcQEiSuLU z/BRqD5b2ROw4ywVEC+BBFLPiyvEGh8qiOhtCYwvsAI0aMadpNyBK3dd5ImO4meJxGUt BzrkJkQwYAxzlP3exFxe2RIKfRAAIufXlxDHo9pIQL94uyXXpSIW496fB34PtmoYC1W0 A0mg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@pqgruber.com header.s=mail header.b=Ou8sANyd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=pqgruber.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id do13si17293179ejc.87.2021.04.07.03.04.24; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 03:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@pqgruber.com header.s=mail header.b=Ou8sANyd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=pqgruber.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346612AbhDFQoh (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:44:37 -0400 Received: from mail.pqgruber.com ([52.59.78.55]:56124 "EHLO mail.pqgruber.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346611AbhDFQoQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:44:16 -0400 Received: from workstation.tuxnet (213-47-165-233.cable.dynamic.surfer.at [213.47.165.233]) by mail.pqgruber.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75961C6AE59; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 18:44:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pqgruber.com; s=mail; t=1617727446; bh=8OABwLBp61V6Ja1BOaDpsU3oRaDqVsPNzSFxGffIGo4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ou8sANydyWPVD3uFXr8PlfpngwWQxIBUWGI/VoofIt9vKEcOuYsvJSEX4fDBS6qvL WzPLKjUygEVsNdKZexf///DndM2L98jWKRwXU5ia0eLfARmvChcnXd4WYv7BqFVmEU aq8x55XTE6JycuJjzwUJJJlXdzjvSRchlwwTxMBk= From: Clemens Gruber To: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Thierry Reding , Sven Van Asbroeck , =?UTF-8?q?Uwe=20Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Clemens Gruber Subject: [PATCH v7 7/8] pwm: pca9685: Restrict period change for enabled PWMs Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 18:41:39 +0200 Message-Id: <20210406164140.81423-7-clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210406164140.81423-1-clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com> References: <20210406164140.81423-1-clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Previously, the last used PWM channel could change the global prescale setting, even if other channels are already in use. Fix it by only allowing the first enabled PWM to change the global chip-wide prescale setting. If there is more than one channel in use, the prescale settings resulting from the chosen periods must match. GPIOs do not count as enabled PWMs as they are not using the prescaler and can't change it. Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber --- Changes since v6: - Only allow the first PWM that is enabled to change the prescaler, not the first one that uses the prescaler drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c index 24221ee7a77a..cf0c98e4ef44 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c @@ -23,11 +23,11 @@ #include /* - * Because the PCA9685 has only one prescaler per chip, changing the period of - * one channel affects the period of all 16 PWM outputs! - * However, the ratio between each configured duty cycle and the chip-wide - * period remains constant, because the OFF time is set in proportion to the - * counter range. + * Because the PCA9685 has only one prescaler per chip, only the first channel + * that is enabled is allowed to change the prescale register. + * PWM channels requested afterwards must use a period that results in the same + * prescale setting as the one set by the first requested channel. + * GPIOs do not count as enabled PWMs as they are not using the prescaler. */ #define PCA9685_MODE1 0x00 @@ -78,8 +78,9 @@ struct pca9685 { struct pwm_chip chip; struct regmap *regmap; -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIOLIB) struct mutex lock; + DECLARE_BITMAP(pwms_enabled, PCA9685_MAXCHAN + 1); +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIOLIB) struct gpio_chip gpio; DECLARE_BITMAP(pwms_inuse, PCA9685_MAXCHAN + 1); #endif @@ -90,6 +91,22 @@ static inline struct pca9685 *to_pca(struct pwm_chip *chip) return container_of(chip, struct pca9685, chip); } +/* This function is supposed to be called with the lock mutex held */ +static bool pca9685_prescaler_can_change(struct pca9685 *pca, int channel) +{ + /* No PWM enabled: Change allowed */ + if (bitmap_empty(pca->pwms_enabled, PCA9685_MAXCHAN + 1)) + return true; + /* More than one PWM enabled: Change not allowed */ + if (bitmap_weight(pca->pwms_enabled, PCA9685_MAXCHAN + 1) > 1) + return false; + /* + * Only one PWM enabled: Change allowed if the PWM about to + * be changed is the one that is already enabled + */ + return test_bit(channel, pca->pwms_enabled); +} + /* Helper function to set the duty cycle ratio to duty/4096 (e.g. duty=2048 -> 50%) */ static void pca9685_pwm_set_duty(struct pca9685 *pca, int channel, unsigned int duty) { @@ -265,8 +282,6 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_gpio_probe(struct pca9685 *pca) { struct device *dev = pca->chip.dev; - mutex_init(&pca->lock); - pca->gpio.label = dev_name(dev); pca->gpio.parent = dev; pca->gpio.request = pca9685_pwm_gpio_request; @@ -310,8 +325,8 @@ static void pca9685_set_sleep_mode(struct pca9685 *pca, bool enable) } } -static int pca9685_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, - const struct pwm_state *state) +static int __pca9685_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, + const struct pwm_state *state) { struct pca9685 *pca = to_pca(chip); unsigned long long duty, prescale; @@ -340,6 +355,12 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, regmap_read(pca->regmap, PCA9685_PRESCALE, &val); if (prescale != val) { + if (!pca9685_prescaler_can_change(pca, pwm->hwpwm)) { + dev_err(chip->dev, + "pwm not changed: periods of enabled pwms must match!\n"); + return -EBUSY; + } + /* * Putting the chip briefly into SLEEP mode * at this point won't interfere with the @@ -360,6 +381,25 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, return 0; } +static int pca9685_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, + const struct pwm_state *state) +{ + struct pca9685 *pca = to_pca(chip); + int ret; + + mutex_lock(&pca->lock); + ret = __pca9685_pwm_apply(chip, pwm, state); + if (ret == 0) { + if (state->enabled) + set_bit(pwm->hwpwm, pca->pwms_enabled); + else + clear_bit(pwm->hwpwm, pca->pwms_enabled); + } + mutex_unlock(&pca->lock); + + return ret; +} + static void pca9685_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state) { @@ -420,7 +460,11 @@ static void pca9685_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) { struct pca9685 *pca = to_pca(chip); + mutex_lock(&pca->lock); pca9685_pwm_set_duty(pca, pwm->hwpwm, 0); + clear_bit(pwm->hwpwm, pca->pwms_enabled); + mutex_unlock(&pca->lock); + pm_runtime_put(chip->dev); pca9685_pwm_clear_inuse(pca, pwm->hwpwm); } @@ -461,6 +505,8 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_probe(struct i2c_client *client, i2c_set_clientdata(client, pca); + mutex_init(&pca->lock); + regmap_read(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE2, ®); if (device_property_read_bool(&client->dev, "invert")) -- 2.31.1