Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp506778pxf; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 05:11:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKwSQfQOABuuuoFTGyqNnJLClh4cNTIXpDRM2kRYJ4j1jzFWIVSGkwxb15AnLlgHYEn5Bd X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8e49:: with SMTP id r9mr2290413ioo.91.1617797474756; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 05:11:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617797474; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xGfCon8GC3jz95Q1J9Eiv7NkN22CYq9RodVH4uJg8uWyfr6dpbRQiVkwUQ0prBwGok jxa4c6zKZHz5LWKi+eWiRImDS2vorgq29SHJLa7ivxojypq4shr7iecAjx5UZc9XOFOY N5W80JI5beeCQeZ/jR9dLm8Yc2pTV2Lu7qTmuOemA9O6mnH2uJ0Lr+ebxUtpoo0GNNBz QkpNRBCQluUvsI++jKnpWsI6UZTdYz5oXgekP/FuKYBHECSnk9Hdk0+k25OXhARUNqzf 18mk6ZGjAtOALkcLeDsN8q868ELZh6iQHSMv7kPygrbFUggfYyoKbnGS06quzN943WG0 9jIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=V+9IBnnDWwF5bA/uOPxMCh5R3le9aBNY4U0lwaK9R/w=; b=bL3wXF2XezGlJ1GxF9Ou2DG9prES9tTlbJi2rn2WaB0+6WQBTaPF278VIRKCqSxPc+ jf8/6hFkpP5u6AV51Lxk+RDEggHijoIhUnrlyia5hI6LNl38uoOiY92SKm7ARi82iw1u EqNAvJYnK3AIpRR4Tt/h60LAGO1RZCSJgmfCAU4A+6GxXMSaXCCxrUMxM3YiOpN4kmfL dBJVhOGx3aAO1jY6/aDIyhpae4f6BpJHIz/qtz1qjwSvsgSATk0wlCoKJjqORL4J4tGS XWWC4x2jhghu8I7J6N6XwXYqkDaCFYwE1e1VyhVjQwOHtQ44kCezoyn2gIEqlXw1iW+V FCLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=adwamluc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w9si22046259jad.47.2021.04.07.05.11.02; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 05:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=adwamluc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235058AbhDFT2p (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 6 Apr 2021 15:28:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52716 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233527AbhDFT2l (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2021 15:28:41 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com (mail-il1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAD4DC06174A; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:28:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id c18so7540010iln.7; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 12:28:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=V+9IBnnDWwF5bA/uOPxMCh5R3le9aBNY4U0lwaK9R/w=; b=adwamlucztIc0MSna8H9oes/oLiAN/OySUHgtAuhHRvhxzetLmHo+Z+cpsbZhOWVAF +2Ez3O5x2unjOXI13majOCOiPDDxnoUhDE23FnNiWrswHIP6eguB05bX4vYKY2VceHHE Zm+RoO9NaFqEi6o/+4E/3kld2u8Pt6ik8o1DE2+T0XTYXBISrn+I9AXK0I+aT20FxVGZ BjOvdipncmX3hHTQj0OzNap6+BHa9Hqh4IBMyGT6wcmPismEK3DWjZ7PK0Z4BjSpQRBF U+NyMR1h8a3+mnsD97AF+Gj/xqpUJVAHS3YNAngIDvGnXltCtLloDRbB3kHUNgFMSUWi 3bkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V+9IBnnDWwF5bA/uOPxMCh5R3le9aBNY4U0lwaK9R/w=; b=eEd8oeWLPGUENSvKfkYfX72MiCL2XYdO/LQw7bdR0xhQAFDju6mjPXpJ/OIBWzqAAy Cbz55FXWN2fzSYFTXKWoMSrfEnCfOpT+Vo8Z0b2paTbtRR4qbSOhGhNO1UJ6P8TNw6S/ MyHy86ygl6fHgC3XB4JLoGb82nPyo9UnvUbP1JmXr9UyjtHU8EoHsPAnNHU0T5xw8gU3 lqrAWoFWhRolVchyjSFASc9gQYFYE93kUJpd0cop1mQODPzmaiXiRXMGV0g0np804iZF 2O2IrwhOnsdlGoBOiNxTMG/4wgXYo9WzP8Sdh5UkCTMSCFG7t/AXtUKTZ3pjCLNlYXD9 KEfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530h0vC3xu/UxBAZqXPL84ckqo6cMK4tyEtHYPjAH1UtgqmR955H 41IbMR8el9+aTocZuVj1IdN+sMuWCNYs0b31Y2Q= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:ec9:: with SMTP id i9mr5379002ilk.0.1617737312092; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 12:28:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210405031436.2465475-1-ilya.lipnitskiy@gmail.com> <20210406174050.GA1963300@robh.at.kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20210406174050.GA1963300@robh.at.kernel.org> From: Ilya Lipnitskiy Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:28:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: property: do not create device links from *nr-gpios To: Rob Herring Cc: Saravana Kannan , Frank Rowand , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , LKML , stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:40 AM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 01:18:56PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 1:10 PM Ilya Lipnitskiy > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Saravana, > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 1:01 PM Saravana Kannan wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 8:14 PM Ilya Lipnitskiy > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > [,]nr-gpios property is used by some GPIO drivers[0] to indicate > > > > > the number of GPIOs present on a system, not define a GPIO. nr-gpios is > > > > > not configured by #gpio-cells and can't be parsed along with other > > > > > "*-gpios" properties. > > > > > > > > > > scripts/dtc/checks.c also has a special case for nr-gpio{s}. However, > > > > > nr-gpio is not really special, so we only need to fix nr-gpios suffix > > > > > here. > > > > > > > > The only example of this that I see is "snps,nr-gpios". > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/apm/apm-shadowcat.dtsi uses "apm,nr-gpios", with > > > parsing code in drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c. There is also code in > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-adnp.c and drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c using > > > "nr-gpios" without any vendor prefix. > > > > Ah ok. I just grepped the DT files. I'm not sure what Rob's position > > is on supporting DT files not in upstream. Thanks for the > > clarification. > > If it's something we had documented, then we have to support it Do I read this correctly as a sort-of Ack of my proposed [PATCH v2] in this thread, since it aligns the code with the published DT schema? Ilya