Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161548AbWJKWH3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:07:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161550AbWJKWH3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:07:29 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:53944 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161548AbWJKWH1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:07:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:07:26 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Roman Zippel Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: more workarounds for recent binutils idiocy Message-ID: <20061011220726.GE29920@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 910 Lines: 23 On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:30:05PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Al Viro wrote: > > > cretinous thing doesn't believe that (%a0)+ is one macro argument and > > splits it in two; worked around by quoting the argument... > > NAK, this is a bug in binutils and is fixed there already (at least in > CVS). OK... Would be nice to find out which versions are broken (that's Documentation/Changes fodder), I'll see to it. What about the first problem? Even current binutils CVS treats foo.bar as a single identifier, and doesn't recognize it as invocation of foo with .bar as the first argument. Any objections against the first patch? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/