Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161348AbWJLAvA (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:51:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161344AbWJLAvA (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:51:00 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:43660 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161342AbWJLAu7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:50:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 01:50:58 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Roman Zippel Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: more workarounds for recent binutils idiocy Message-ID: <20061012005058.GG29920@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20061011220726.GE29920@ftp.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061011220726.GE29920@ftp.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 689 Lines: 15 On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:07:26PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > OK... Would be nice to find out which versions are broken (that's > Documentation/Changes fodder), I'll see to it. 2.16.91.0.[3-6] are to be avoided on m68k. > What about the first problem? Even current binutils CVS treats > foo.bar as a single identifier, and doesn't recognize it as invocation > of foo with .bar as the first argument. Any objections against the > first patch? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/