Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: /VmLyr/Rl3+1d4Fp2DKKJw5c0Dt7YESIBsC9JvSmLah6PuuuP2qFAmjykEPgEKP6hTNh5gK44U
 9uIe7M8JEjnA==
IronPort-SDR: T564wGKdTeClaEZPhYi7/7qf+X0utw9M03rjhId8jkKsTCDcDpavSWdyHaN/DIh/9UbvHkCRFO
 SvtJ/pIm67vw==
Date:   Wed, 7 Apr 2021 20:10:53 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ata: Drop unneeded inclusion of kernel.h in the
 header
Message-ID: <YG3nnZ3oofekVmhK@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20210407134706.81383-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <202104072325.Zv0JLqbH-lkp@intel.com>
 <YG3X7ogK/Oq2Hv4J@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <5111151e-35a5-0422-8414-7b900f01d316@kernel.dk>
 <YG3ddNiPdUgRmBZc@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <728ec7f8-310e-e478-bd53-8784392aee25@kernel.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <728ec7f8-310e-e478-bd53-8784392aee25@kernel.dk>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:43:53AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/7/21 10:27 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:04:49AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 4/7/21 10:03 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:51:31PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> >>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, we need to include bits.h.
> >>> (It passed my simple build, but appears I have no such driver included)
> >>>
> >>> Jens, I saw your message, should I send a follow up fix, or a v2?
> >>
> >> Let's just drop it, not worth it for the risk imho.
> > 
> > Does it mean I may try again in next cycle?
> > 
> > Because kernel.h inclusion seems to me too wrong there.
> 
> I don't mind taking it, but not on a hunch. If you send something
> that has been thought about and went through full compilation, then
> you can resend it.

Got it! I think allyesconfig would serve a good job.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko