Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp916697pxf; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:01:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzQq0znPre61hSrn8DbXaom6CKl1znGLebqrlCO0nE4wFtBFxmrMBd1PiOsfpYKbqxkLrt X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e886:b029:e7:386b:1b30 with SMTP id w6-20020a170902e886b02900e7386b1b30mr4949998plg.42.1617832868121; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:01:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617832868; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AyjvJy8od6XNMmtdEXqkL7j3BLKE74Z1sebUmmpWJS6NC8J0ZjfPbPq7PrjqufnuYf 2XPOfE43C/0MEzPEXhzpBX+1jrDx9BXsRPbYmQQzkVUaAmiSLmKg6V605DAF6za+CFvR 2I5UgFjK5GJVGbQIiMbI47xfMXoqlzQTqhwZlt57TDyPhnWxn6hRLOADRXZ4BCD0PhPb bHLamQqpIITMDZQgux9/EzmfzSrrN2XklgZeNiZuNtGZVHkKPxUyhfFVUqsFmtHNDf7n jVvtnZOGQ+MBxp2RmwIlqJF7V+Lpq7Min1IrikUCrT+GZCob2BJ3ZXaVJ0PZyEv3Xr2/ Y5LA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=xtWZ787MlQUKg7hTVZQgduf2IbH/MKv8i1FMG/FmukA=; b=WqVQ8emyXkKNzOd4ci3KeQ8TLHpv4WvQcuWrJeUGLpwMJ5IxSniIBrEWCWgfPhvCDD P5k6++7T4Do4OtxJsRGBmMyvqMAxbYN2uIH/1P3dtfIhWaRRFc/ZjBLIA8iiXD4d88za DBl8BHvFNkJwlhvRpsPrYyBkhRx80NLtE90+k4mzl9nyuhqykRLhsIT978aaP3Kl+TmH 95V9oT8/uq9wEJqL0WDchcxi8Lof7e+iRe7vdsDUommyCGJBGuKDSqfzZzdMp3EUmS/K A5yHNlpWTtZX4S1aPN0m2qbqC58YTjYjdQ3B8VxOFBtG6XnKtDyzqSMkfBQoq+teYpb9 qK4g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=nRDuuvK2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o184si5241080pgo.513.2021.04.07.15.00.56; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:01:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=nRDuuvK2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236555AbhDGUI6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:08:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38166 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233523AbhDGUI6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:08:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E889C061760 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 13:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id h25so13908555pgm.3 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 13:08:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=xtWZ787MlQUKg7hTVZQgduf2IbH/MKv8i1FMG/FmukA=; b=nRDuuvK2QA1vyj5nKYztc+o90COIxHA0LRuaVf7jhCaPWPWFP9AmCwZevhPJ1rz/Tu zuGn2HQM66SIpnq1XPELoBB7iulqG3lzHzHL6Ge2VZvHTOazhKiqSYjm1O0EQw6X0L9z yfxLfv7eChkGaBsKnuF0j6wMwrgiFYsy1BBa4ue2UgvQgM3/4xkKUuWP1E9MGSDaFzLA s6ykEhkHb2B0VXsmFMRr4eD/D3X9Q/JiyeOJVqRNsYyVNM8gxg34MUmHyMXb8Gk4LniA mKZuXTGs5Kn9J8kl1vuIeJw/SDcTwhu+v7pjtT3sJYQ4J6790ZTokOb3YNqbMRn2jBIk uQXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=xtWZ787MlQUKg7hTVZQgduf2IbH/MKv8i1FMG/FmukA=; b=asMHzj/WZ4VTV0X90BU5j/pZnrHxKhjyGv+LbZeaK9+yR3jUi+aj2BkX6mLtrIQiKN LSkIGqLCpP2igIFH8IoXebBAWQuYanpsIoIYDEd9ktnEa+499ncBuO8SBUeFcCwgG4RX sWzqUpipp9fj3NAoSudDOm/5hDSTJ75UcC1y8TqdQkae4CRlRYnmR90N9r+JBse2yO+U f1SPaQVIKxcjOsCrh2MRoc8LlPHXu/bXb2eDucPq4FKRcNsQB82eP2Zaa1Bw6lkRqoCA P8aNhQ2mQpqHGyK4SR7mLMreN6q43EwDPWpJMvaefCfHRI9+V/qewOc4cFQRNkmGXNo/ xp1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532PFohkzzDeD3lkpQbE1svE3oYvX8fZG3QVDA0IzYlkyBKuOK70 sX/otQmpRsl6qwPYnO2LtG1Ykg== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9e43:0:b029:1f3:a2b3:d9fd with SMTP id z3-20020aa79e430000b02901f3a2b3d9fdmr4445146pfq.74.1617826127566; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 13:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (240.111.247.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.247.111.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b126sm22346155pga.91.2021.04.07.13.08.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Apr 2021 13:08:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 20:08:42 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Tom Lendacky Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Borislav Petkov , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Brijesh Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Make sure GHCB is mapped before updating Message-ID: References: <03b349cb19b360d4c2bbeebdd171f99298082d28.1617820214.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <03b349cb19b360d4c2bbeebdd171f99298082d28.1617820214.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 07, 2021, Tom Lendacky wrote: > From: Tom Lendacky > > The sev_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector() routine will update the GHCB to inform > the caller of the AP Reset Hold NAE event that a SIPI has been delivered. > However, if a SIPI is performed without a corresponding AP Reset Hold, > then the GHCB may not be mapped, which will result in a NULL pointer > dereference. > > Check that the GHCB is mapped before attempting the update. It's tempting to say the ghcb_set_*() helpers should guard against this, but that would add a lot of pollution and the vast majority of uses are very clearly in the vmgexit path. svm_complete_emulated_msr() is the only other case that is non-obvious; would it make sense to sanity check svm->ghcb there as well? diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c index 019ac836dcd0..abe9c765628f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c @@ -2728,7 +2728,8 @@ static int svm_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info) static int svm_complete_emulated_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int err) { struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu); - if (!sev_es_guest(vcpu->kvm) || !err) + + if (!err || !sev_es_guest(vcpu->kvm) || !WARN_ON_ONCE(svm->ghcb)) return kvm_complete_insn_gp(vcpu, err); ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_1(svm->ghcb, 1); > Fixes: 647daca25d24 ("KVM: SVM: Add support for booting APs in an SEV-ES guest") > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky Either way: Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson > --- > arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c > index 83e00e524513..13758e3b106d 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c > @@ -2105,5 +2105,6 @@ void sev_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 vector) > * the guest will set the CS and RIP. Set SW_EXIT_INFO_2 to a > * non-zero value. > */ > - ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_2(svm->ghcb, 1); > + if (svm->ghcb) > + ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_2(svm->ghcb, 1); > } > -- > 2.31.0 >