Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210407185456.41943-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>
 <20210407185456.41943-2-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20210407142121.677e971e9e5dc85643441811@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210407142121.677e971e9e5dc85643441811@linux-foundation.org>
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Apr 2021 14:28:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdnSRsUj9dvKP_1Dd9+WwLJwaK0mC-T9mL+jsQvRfwLZmg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gcov: re-fix clang-11+ support
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
        Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
        Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>,
        "# 3.4.x" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 2:21 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed,  7 Apr 2021 11:54:55 -0700 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
>
> > LLVM changed the expected function signature for
> > llvm_gcda_emit_function() in the clang-11 release.  Users of clang-11 or
> > newer may have noticed their kernels producing invalid coverage
> > information:
> >
> > $ llvm-cov gcov -a -c -u -f -b <input>.gcda -- gcno=<input>.gcno
> > 1 <func>: checksum mismatch, \
> >   (<lineno chksum A>, <cfg chksum B>) != (<lineno chksum A>, <cfg chksum C>)
> > 2 Invalid .gcda File!
> > ...
> >
> > Fix up the function signatures so calling this function interprets its
> > parameters correctly and computes the correct cfg checksum. In
> > particular, in clang-11, the additional checksum is no longer optional.
>
> Which tree is this against?  I'm seeing quite a lot of rejects against
> Linus's current.

Today's linux-next; the only recent changes to this single source file
since my last patches were:

commit b3c4e66c908b ("gcov: combine common code")
commit 17d0508a080d ("gcov: use kvmalloc()")

both have your sign off, so I assume those are in your tree?

-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers