Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 13:12:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 13:12:16 -0500 Received: from h24-64-71-161.cg.shawcable.net ([24.64.71.161]:3069 "EHLO lynx.adilger.int") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 13:12:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:10:24 -0700 From: Andreas Dilger To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Cc: "David S. Miller" , tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de, jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, andrewm@uow.edu.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com, ak@muc.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup Message-ID: <20011108111024.X5922@lynx.no> Mail-Followup-To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, "David S. Miller" , tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de, jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, andrewm@uow.edu.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com, ak@muc.de In-Reply-To: <20011107.160950.57890584.davem@redhat.com> <200111081754.UAA24454@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <200111081754.UAA24454@ms2.inr.ac.ru>; from kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru on Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 08:54:29PM +0300 X-GPG-Key: 1024D/0D35BED6 X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7A37 5D79 BF1B CECA D44F 8A29 A488 39F5 0D35 BED6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Nov 08, 2001 20:54 +0300, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote: > I want to _ask_ one thing people working on these changes. > _Please_, defer this edit to 2.5. The changes are very good, > but time for them is very bad. > > When I wrote this code the macros did not exist. Well, Alan said the same thing, and I went and checked - the macros existed since 2.1.106, probably the last time there was a "jiffies wrap" effort. It is more likely that nobody knows about them, because nobody uses them, because nobody knows about them, etc. > However, this code is right, take my word. Hence, it is pure maintanance > problem and as soon as main reader of this code is me, I would be glad to > see the changes, but only having no deadlines. If people don't want to see them, that is fine with me - they will stop. Tim and I were only trying to fix instability that he noticed when initializing jiffies to some large pre-wrap value. If people are OK with 2.4 Linux boxes hanging after 497 days, that is fine with me. The only box I have that could stay up that long is my router (486/33), and it does not have a UPS so it is not likely to actually make it (record is 6 months or so). Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/ http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/