Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] USB:ehci:Add a whitelist for EHCI controllers
To:     Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        <mathias.nyman@intel.com>, <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
        <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
CC:     <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <kong.kongxinwei@hisilicon.com>, <yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>
References: <1617873073-37371-1-git-send-email-liulongfang@huawei.com>
 <1617873073-37371-2-git-send-email-liulongfang@huawei.com>
 <a14fcaffd6e26081c07bcfa36a81ded38dcf88b2.camel@suse.com>
From:   liulongfang <liulongfang@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <0d5963d0-9e25-5411-67df-146bf924fc17@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:44:39 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a14fcaffd6e26081c07bcfa36a81ded38dcf88b2.camel@suse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2021/4/8 17:33, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2021, 17:11 +0800 schrieb Longfang Liu:
>> Some types of EHCI controllers do not have SBRN registers.
>> By comparing the white list, the operation of reading the SBRN
>> registers is skipped.
>>
>> Subsequent EHCI controller types without SBRN registers can be
>> directly added to the white list.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> shouldn't this set a flag for a missing functionality?
> 
> 	Regards
> 		Oliver
> 
> 
> .
> 
This flag is ehci->sbrn.
Thanks,
Longfang