Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp292283pxf; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 03:16:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1nMVZbgoY8IErEqpak6fRFpQfnzCX++3x9n98HhQEEse5Kcm9O4b/lA1D/VIlnoBcUAMC X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c54d:: with SMTP id s13mr10100646edr.334.1617876966297; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 03:16:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617876966; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XHcZLzDMqh0+ahhizITvLoWBvk7ti+XApw64tc3WU/X84VpbeenYWXAjn0DRCgkd+Q 2HKk+QsDk/kw1ulMT8/5LZ+UgmK7bfYGTGrXflEZ90lF8hfYxeU/yNSvcY96HsvWz8MO YvdWKffqw+r30Y7jaCQW7mLrtU/y/tkKNoseqLB145TvaZnxarTXoDuwdaCz7+XU5zHa DscOmB6IF+gamuYGFypvQvtETejWmzxb5e9gwYsQa05z37F1VNYtNxvhbByUuI3la8qv 9Jl6nnEWO/ap/2HtcAdVe3kDWGyhL/UJVh2QpkpDLaMYtW+AusAtC2P0IvZD90jbby1u OgvA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=aVLaGjmHWYQhG4sAaTtrc4IcnaIUQqECzU/UslOQXf4=; b=joXP07ffQR9aG8w60/OL6tx7lnowULNXCLTH7IKiwpZ5KQ3Dur4+jlq8ded433+iGb YPNNAIW/R7+23rBTI1sghH3E2g60DHsxNsB0IL2PSDGyIlEU1I+lnIu8E5sZ9Ye+TW8W gFKoroUvjVN/5WHCPGJYLPTMATUz9zofGV357poaPKuoU0H8JZ9PAOH4NdEQiKmvlK7c k1gWneGQcfjjitPZOg9H7vj2EA616bECqhI7zIbTD7Gjd/Qpi5pzO9BLxLXKcydQ8DXF lImPVYTVtNDRgXgv6mgSvFUJrnKtdpnR1n0GLO11n5bPu5uNoNqkUTGBmZMXQ8csjIGY BeHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c20si21341836ejk.730.2021.04.08.03.15.42; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 03:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229741AbhDHKO4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 8 Apr 2021 06:14:56 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54218 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229600AbhDHKOw (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2021 06:14:52 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F82AF9E; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 12:14:37 +0200 From: Oscar Salvador To: Dave Hansen Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, shy828301@gmail.com, weixugc@google.com, ying.huang@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm/migrate: make migrate_pages() return nr_succeeded Message-ID: References: <20210401183216.443C4443@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20210401183223.80F1E291@viggo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210401183223.80F1E291@viggo.jf.intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:32:23AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > From: Yang Shi > > The migrate_pages() returns the number of pages that were not migrated, > or an error code. When returning an error code, there is no way to know > how many pages were migrated or not migrated. > > In the following patch, migrate_pages() is used to demote pages to PMEM > node, we need account how many pages are reclaimed (demoted) since page > reclaim behavior depends on this. Add *nr_succeeded parameter to make > migrate_pages() return how many pages are demoted successfully for all > cases. > > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen > Reviewed-by: Yang Shi > Cc: Wei Xu > Cc: Huang Ying > Cc: Dan Williams > Cc: David Hildenbrand > Cc: osalvador > ... > int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page, > free_page_t put_new_page, unsigned long private, > - enum migrate_mode mode, int reason) > + enum migrate_mode mode, int reason, unsigned int *nr_succeeded) > { > int retry = 1; > int thp_retry = 1; > int nr_failed = 0; > - int nr_succeeded = 0; > int nr_thp_succeeded = 0; > int nr_thp_failed = 0; > int nr_thp_split = 0; > @@ -1611,10 +1611,10 @@ retry: > case MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS: > if (is_thp) { > nr_thp_succeeded++; > - nr_succeeded += nr_subpages; > + *nr_succeeded += nr_subpages; > break; > } > - nr_succeeded++; > + (*nr_succeeded)++; > break; > default: > /* > @@ -1643,12 +1643,12 @@ out: > */ > list_splice(&ret_pages, from); > > - count_vm_events(PGMIGRATE_SUCCESS, nr_succeeded); > + count_vm_events(PGMIGRATE_SUCCESS, *nr_succeeded); > count_vm_events(PGMIGRATE_FAIL, nr_failed); > count_vm_events(THP_MIGRATION_SUCCESS, nr_thp_succeeded); > count_vm_events(THP_MIGRATION_FAIL, nr_thp_failed); > count_vm_events(THP_MIGRATION_SPLIT, nr_thp_split); > - trace_mm_migrate_pages(nr_succeeded, nr_failed, nr_thp_succeeded, > + trace_mm_migrate_pages(*nr_succeeded, nr_failed, nr_thp_succeeded, > nr_thp_failed, nr_thp_split, mode, reason); It seems that reclaiming is the only user who cared about how many pages could we migrated, could not do the following instead: diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index 695a594e5860..d4170b7ea2fe 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -1503,7 +1503,7 @@ static inline int try_split_thp(struct page *page, struct page **page2, */ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page, free_page_t put_new_page, unsigned long private, - enum migrate_mode mode, int reason) + enum migrate_mode mode, int reason, unsigned int *ret_succeeded) { int retry = 1; int thp_retry = 1; @@ -1654,6 +1654,9 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page, if (!swapwrite) current->flags &= ~PF_SWAPWRITE; + if (ret_succedded) + *ret_succedded = nr_succedded; + return rc; } And pass only a valid pointer from demote_page_list() and NULL from all the others? I was just wondered after all those "unsigned int nr_succedded" in all other functions. This would also solve the "be careful to initialize nr_succedded" problem? -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3