Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <0049152ce9da85c50fda91c1b77ca233ba0fef3d.camel@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] USB: cdc-acm: fix TIOCGSERIAL implementation
From:   Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Thu, 08 Apr 2021 13:34:12 +0200
In-Reply-To: <YG7RiLoscS6VXG7n@hovoldconsulting.com>
References: <20210407102845.32720-1-johan@kernel.org>
         <20210407102845.32720-4-johan@kernel.org>
         <a1a94db2d373c4c7b8841908d8e6133ab022232e.camel@suse.com>
         <YG7RiLoscS6VXG7n@hovoldconsulting.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2021, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Johan Hovold:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:36:46AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 07.04.2021, 12:28 +0200 schrieb Johan Hovold:

> > Well, the devices report it. It is part of the standard.
> 
> No, the standard doesn't include anything about a baud-base clock
> AFAICT.

Unfortunately it does.
dwDTERate - chapter 6.3.11 - table 17

If we does this wrongly, we should certainly fix it, but just removing
the reporting doesn't look right to me.

	Regards
		Oliver