Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp528509pxf; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 07:58:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNX0eQAR13XXGHFztbvD+k5ze4++L/ps/4fjHUPa8I1wP+mVuXUzQzWzJ2Mufax/496k9x X-Received: by 2002:aa7:860f:0:b029:200:851:1bff with SMTP id p15-20020aa7860f0000b029020008511bffmr7888077pfn.64.1617893934546; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 07:58:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617893934; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZNxkgexDdrXoAoJjT7JWOCRnWDIvPCAKbGtAbFPGpdAQoTwloNwxUA2fcbaTyb8szv iAWZ8UnYScHGTQZMIyDIZNQnPIAY6qMrkCzB9ljQnbXGjM64kGilAwtUhQSnAoHjy23X GBOkN8J7FOHG1GzLuIwiAjLVxC6hRpdVgakLQqkM05w3bphWY3motYcqsVYDnOSY4/YX g8R6sSdsuSdAcB4Y/Jd51aMN2AJvwYatJTAUxwVYgY0qvlmp2iYd5h/nQO9rgRcFC76o 1S9P2PgccSR9xrpGVQqM40ECSd3Gt/HmNPuL69Dnw1aVSaXmvaRTAyi0Y7/atBsn2Dfy 5eDw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=/HIWlnwEo4YLD1xLBod5jttoU1M1FcspNfG7zYpZ64o=; b=WayWJ3WjDiShmPnC3HTAUXXygpdSf+B/AYFZDQ9SSquN1rzNhMONeyDEYeaSzWouyE 3ljQ5Ae+IH9VPRh30BvGFTnvq5O7pycs0uc0VtT8WZ7HQlZbHx/ZwuKkw3ZcAxnEmTtE QSBZ+w1DsF/0aT0TPQnIwgviuLA9JlqV7NShqLiALcv53n5OJre9sMmhDPk4UVXxexb0 Y6VhDvR9mmNbcTOxhV3coiiduRBZqokEWwU5ai005aM/lrGgKhtZOyn3pwfYbBw7kDKV d9WWixzHEMnpI4xagL5bXESDRL/vKoiJJAyQhGbNGP8XVEHWEevWbkImq0W4Gi1yc6mQ GWPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Tl0OUXv7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i1si26418648pgj.269.2021.04.08.07.58.42; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 07:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Tl0OUXv7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231944AbhDHO4Y (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:56:24 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40898 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232009AbhDHO4T (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:56:19 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92784610F9; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 14:56:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1617893768; bh=dRsg/D7XwR/Opxe8txb8yjZZERiYX9xCaPVknGOYM/M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Tl0OUXv79OcKikGGlNJj2e8yH3bMvRkH0zAVA5oaugYzD0d5iht0PzMb6yUGqwPKO DGb2+LJp9YQ0vSwttlDrL96mvidHI4XikDZfJLQ9yAggFwGsVoYGM/oAq8B48v1Uxp Xeu8SSezDPyc0m6z+m9ILzR1RHpAcXwYVhWynJeQKr+V1Q96qsO/Dp4W8jN7K4ae+z 0qOzWEGKIcCn3FUk17iE4XupAf+PMZFR7vnFBiTfvPguisBBjmCahSWKq1pC3LtTVN KyI1uUcMOMaGNNvjCVQq5wsPRV7cN9XzDIkMNvpEuhyKoW+eFIWIkKWh8ISAXToJJ9 Gixm1cMRz+72g== Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:56:04 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Vincenzo Frascino Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mte: Move MTE TCF0 check in entry-common Message-ID: <20210408145604.GB18211@willie-the-truck> References: <20210408143723.13024-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210408143723.13024-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 03:37:23PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote: > The check_mte_async_tcf macro sets the TIF flag non-atomically. This can > race with another CPU doing a set_tsk_thread_flag() and the flag can be > lost in the process. Actually, it's all the *other* flags that get lost! > Move the tcf0 check to enter_from_user_mode() and clear tcf0 in > exit_to_user_mode() to address the problem. > > Note: Moving the check in entry-common allows to use set_thread_flag() > which is safe. > > Fixes: 637ec831ea4f ("arm64: mte: Handle synchronous and asynchronous > tag check faults") > Cc: Catalin Marinas > Cc: Will Deacon > Reported-by: Will Deacon > Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h | 8 ++++++++ > arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 6 ++++++ > arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 30 ------------------------------ > arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h > index 9b557a457f24..188f778c6f7b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h > @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ void mte_invalidate_tags(int type, pgoff_t offset); > void mte_invalidate_tags_area(int type); > void *mte_allocate_tag_storage(void); > void mte_free_tag_storage(char *storage); > +void check_mte_async_tcf0(void); > +void clear_mte_async_tcf0(void); > > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MTE > > @@ -83,6 +85,12 @@ static inline int mte_ptrace_copy_tags(struct task_struct *child, > { > return -EIO; > } > +void check_mte_async_tcf0(void) > +{ > +} > +void clear_mte_async_tcf0(void) > +{ > +} > > static inline void mte_assign_mem_tag_range(void *addr, size_t size) > { > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c > index 9d3588450473..837d3624a1d5 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c > @@ -289,10 +289,16 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr enter_from_user_mode(void) > CT_WARN_ON(ct_state() != CONTEXT_USER); > user_exit_irqoff(); > trace_hardirqs_off_finish(); > + > + /* Check for asynchronous tag check faults in user space */ > + check_mte_async_tcf0(); > } Is enter_from_user_mode() always called when we enter the kernel from EL0? afaict, some paths (e.g. el0_irq()) only end up calling it if CONTEXT_TRACKING or TRACE_IRQFLAGS are enabled. > > asmlinkage void noinstr exit_to_user_mode(void) > { > + /* Ignore asynchronous tag check faults in the uaccess routines */ > + clear_mte_async_tcf0(); > + and this one seems to be called even less often. Will