Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp716770pxf; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 11:13:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+jticvweMucKzUjTLEcTExepvwUBZ13Zhbn+G7UHk6oJ9AQr9pzEhLmTtAOlJcNyET8G3 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:148a:: with SMTP id e10mr13062661edv.377.1617905631557; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 11:13:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1617905631; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kJQQKJVsi5HXny+mMa6mFsc20Kra0V1Leyml1LMAofTEwBmsngdXNXXV1JuG02vKKd +BryTf5/KxIGVEG51Jfgf/Cc/dcmftwc1k4jcxbRKMhGqnkd+MLcxk/epADpVIkwsyan mp35PeGegRINaum6maOCWXDtsEOeWnUzqIy5l4bZF9SJv9/hCypiMX9aLZH51uSNHawc 42qMDOY6GgkYlYO9BYjLGssjq9wepdk7fyMFa4UyMDLTWXnODNik/bbtMxwep82btHPs ylecfxPQJyYgn1fx3ofbSmAc1cCIeqvZMzgzL8nJLgt7dIgsp8fZ9pvFE2QLlh89HT5H MtMg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=bCq+534dSmgZlJutp7RHJWpW2fo+VyS7Z/J7BjmKTeM=; b=EanU5T0lDg2bOYPA+VGutNg3SMyHmWwwem9VsjfVWcvZBYIvGd1Gv3PbcEtkd/ospl GkjDsjbDyDprLKfw19/bDqqMr15BJmc6dBKPxlVBsInY/SCsVLv6a+3daaOWUJBcbpAM bdm6zre+VRjE1n/PYRhCnl6Pdeg4Aogh8xS6YfQEXt7FN1LXtXuuyfY3wTnRZjqJVet/ c/jw/Jp7VqvTpZivVx8rnWPPbRH1H/V/egeK9FpboQqh5IK+fY23Av7jE7SFjMn4Kdk+ PceYbW4ARgN1zaF9Yzl9fmCLWxtGgNN5FWmEiM2HxuMlmsU3ySCYYnp+BTy33HSTMPAN LCtw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=vRbXIvaT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i13si168815edr.59.2021.04.08.11.13.27; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 11:13:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=vRbXIvaT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232267AbhDHSKg (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 8 Apr 2021 14:10:36 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36690 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231716AbhDHSKf (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2021 14:10:35 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 637BA610CA; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 18:10:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1617905424; bh=b6UhGDmqyefe9/qRro35BT4OuGSkRxu8JrK/cweYHaU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=vRbXIvaTTZpAhWapgDxanygLRb1k8inDDUlUr8Zx8mZm/oe+AuTPhbbIM9XR03qKN Hwfww9S3q127AT1zTg8PvyqEwhPCuPJBIY4Zj2bHkOVwlFX/Nn7uj5KKZnc0FktKnP uDqqPeNpqKJaXRwElGGzhjNmn4Txdqp4tcugEEfI= Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 20:10:21 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Min Li Cc: "derek.kiernan@xilinx.com" , "dragan.cvetic@xilinx.com" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] misc: Add Renesas Synchronization Management Unit (SMU) support Message-ID: References: <1617846650-10058-1-git-send-email-min.li.xe@renesas.com> <1617846650-10058-2-git-send-email-min.li.xe@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 06:01:42PM +0000, Min Li wrote: > > > > That does not make sense, this is only one kernel module, with one .h file in > > this patch, I do not see those other files you are talking about... > > > > And if you have named registers that are identical, and yet you only work on > > one device, that feels like a design flaw somewhere :) > > > > Hi Greg, the register files are in the 1/2 patch for the mfd part of the change. > The reason they have same named register is because they are all synchronization > devices and they share some similar features But what does that have to do with the misc device? totally confused, greg k-h