Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] integrity: Add declarations to init_once void
 arguments.
To:     zohar@linux.ibm.com
Cc:     jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
References: <20210407014438.39516-1-unclexiaole@gmail.com>
From:   Jiele Zhao <unclexiaole@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4a41b0e9-a1cd-deaf-8b22-a4ca33968496@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Apr 2021 09:24:49 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210407014438.39516-1-unclexiaole@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Mimi,

And this is another patch that has been modified.

On 2021/4/7 9:44, Jiele Zhao wrote:
> init_once is a callback to kmem_cache_create. The parameter
> type of this function is void *, so it's better to give a
> explicit cast here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiele Zhao <unclexiaole@gmail.com>
> ---
>   security/integrity/iint.c         | 2 +-
>   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +-
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/iint.c b/security/integrity/iint.c
> index 0ba01847e836..fca8a9409e4a 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/iint.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/iint.c
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ void integrity_inode_free(struct inode *inode)
>   
>   static void init_once(void *foo)
>   {
> -	struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = foo;
> +	struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = (struct integrity_iint_cache *) foo;
>   
>   	memset(iint, 0, sizeof(*iint));
>   	iint->ima_file_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> index 9ef748ea829f..03bef720ab44 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
>   }
>   
>   /**
> - * ima_path_check - based on policy, collect/store measurement.
> + * ima_file_check - based on policy, collect/store measurement.
>    * @file: pointer to the file to be measured
>    * @mask: contains MAY_READ, MAY_WRITE, MAY_EXEC or MAY_APPEND
>    *