Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751022AbWJLVZa (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:25:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751036AbWJLVZa (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:25:30 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:4019 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751010AbWJLVZa (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:25:30 -0400 Subject: Re: USB performance bug since kernel 2.6.13 (CRITICAL???) From: Lee Revell To: Open Source Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20061012205651.2853.qmail@web58103.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <20061012205651.2853.qmail@web58103.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:26:26 -0400 Message-Id: <1160688386.24931.95.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 912 Lines: 19 On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 13:56 -0700, Open Source wrote: > Yes, I am pretty sure you are right about the timing. But it shouldn't be that way. If it is, then there's a bug. > > I'm fully willing to accept there is something else I should be doing driver-wise, but it shoudn't require recompiling the stock distribution kernels. Otherwise, Linux is not competitive with Microsoft Windows in this regard! > > I'll try a recompile and report back. In the meantime, if anyone else has any ideas, please let me know! > Yes, I agree that it would be a bug. If it turns out to be related to CONFIG_HZ, ask your distro why they rolled it back from 1000 to 250Hz. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/