Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751194AbWJLWRl (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:17:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751196AbWJLWRl (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:17:41 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:65435 "EHLO mail.goop.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751194AbWJLWRl (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:17:41 -0400 Message-ID: <452EBF7C.3000409@goop.org> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:19:40 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061004) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Brown, Len" , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" CC: acpi-devel@kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Strange entries in /proc/acpi/thermal_zone for Thinkpad X60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2202 Lines: 64 I have a Thinkpad X60 with an Intel Core Duo T2400. In /proc/acpi/thermal_zone, I'm getting two subdirectories, each with their own set of files: /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM0/cooling_mode: cooling mode: critical /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM0/polling_frequency: /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM0/state: state: ok /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM0/temperature: temperature: 53 C /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM0/trip_points: critical (S5): 127 C /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM1/cooling_mode: cooling mode: passive /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM1/polling_frequency: /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM1/state: state: ok /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM1/temperature: temperature: 53 C /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM1/trip_points: critical (S5): 97 C passive: 93 C: tc1=5 tc2=4 tsp=600 devices=0xf7eaa264 0xf7eaa244 The interesting thing is that the two sets of files are not consistent - sometimes they don't even show the same temperature. The reason I'm interested in this is that I think it's behind some of my cpufreq problems. Sometimes the kernel decides that I just can't raise the max frequency above 1GHz, because its been thermally limited (I've put printks in to confirm that its the ACPI thermal limit on the policy notifier chain which is limiting the max speed). It seems to me that having a thermal zone for each core is a BIOS bug, since they're really the same chip, but the THM1 entries should be ignored. I don't believe the CPU has ever approached either 97 C, let alone 127; while I put it under a fair amount of load, it is sitting on a desktop with no airflow obstructions, so if it really is overheating it suggests a serious design problem with the hardware. But I'm just speculating; I'm not really sure what all this means. Any clues? Thanks, J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/