Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To:     guro@fb.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, shakeelb@google.com,
        vdavydov.dev@gmail.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        duanxiongchun@bytedance.com, fam.zheng@bytedance.com,
        bsingharora@gmail.com, shy828301@gmail.com,
        alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com, Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 07/18] mm: memcontrol: introduce compact_lock_page_lruvec_irqsave
Date:   Fri,  9 Apr 2021 20:29:48 +0800
Message-Id: <20210409122959.82264-8-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210409122959.82264-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
References: <20210409122959.82264-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

If we reuse the objcg APIs to charge LRU pages, the page_memcg()
can be changed when the LRU pages reparented. In this case, we need
to acquire the new lruvec lock.

    lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page);

    // The page is reparented.

    compact_lock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, &flags, cc);

    // Acquired the wrong lruvec lock and need to retry.

But compact_lock_irqsave() only take lruvec lock as the parameter,
we cannot aware this change. If it can take the page as parameter
to acquire the lruvec lock. When the page memcg is changed, we can
use the page_memcg() detect whether we need to reacquire the new
lruvec lock. So compact_lock_irqsave() is not suitable for us.
Similar to lock_page_lruvec_irqsave(), introduce
compact_lock_page_lruvec_irqsave() to acquire the lruvec lock in
the compaction routine.

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
 mm/compaction.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index e7da342003dd..c9efe3542b0a 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -511,6 +511,29 @@ static bool compact_lock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static struct lruvec *
+compact_lock_page_lruvec_irqsave(struct page *page, unsigned long *flags,
+				 struct compact_control *cc)
+{
+	struct lruvec *lruvec;
+
+	lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page);
+
+	/* Track if the lock is contended in async mode */
+	if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC && !cc->contended) {
+		if (spin_trylock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, *flags))
+			goto out;
+
+		cc->contended = true;
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, *flags);
+out:
+	lruvec_memcg_debug(lruvec, page);
+
+	return lruvec;
+}
+
 /*
  * Compaction requires the taking of some coarse locks that are potentially
  * very heavily contended. The lock should be periodically unlocked to avoid
@@ -1040,10 +1063,8 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 			if (locked)
 				unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked, flags);
 
-			compact_lock_irqsave(&lruvec->lru_lock, &flags, cc);
-			locked = lruvec;
-
-			lruvec_memcg_debug(lruvec, page);
+			locked = compact_lock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, &flags, cc);
+			lruvec = locked;
 
 			/* Try get exclusive access under lock */
 			if (!skip_updated) {
-- 
2.11.0