Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] swiotlb: Make SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE perform no allocation
To:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        "open list:SWIOTLB SUBSYSTEM" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
References: <20210321033740.312500-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
 <20210323015350.399493-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20210324084250.GA4474@lst.de>
 <2ad22811-24e8-0776-3e55-ea2a4ac55f55@gmail.com>
 <YHCr2ziJxmISCcEW@Konrads-MacBook-Pro.local>
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6bb1088e-f502-951b-ab0f-cfc872834a5e@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Apr 2021 13:33:05 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YHCr2ziJxmISCcEW@Konrads-MacBook-Pro.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 4/9/2021 12:32 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 08:13:07PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/24/2021 1:42 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 06:53:49PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>> When SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE is used, there should really be no allocations of
>>>> default_nslabs to occur since we are not going to use those slabs. If a
>>>> platform was somehow setting swiotlb_no_force and a later call to
>>>> swiotlb_init() was to be made we would still be proceeding with
>>>> allocating the default SWIOTLB size (64MB), whereas if swiotlb=noforce
>>>> was set on the kernel command line we would have only allocated 2KB.
>>>>
>>>> This would be inconsistent and the point of initializing default_nslabs
>>>> to 1, was intended to allocate the minimum amount of memory possible, so
>>>> simply remove that minimal allocation period.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Looks good,
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks! Konrad, can you apply this patch to your for-linus-5.13 branch
>> if you are also happy with it?
> 
> It should be now visible?

Not seeing it here:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/swiotlb.git/log/?h=devel/for-linus-5.13
-- 
Florian